Governor Gavin Newsom and Karla Nemeth, Director of the California Department of Water Resources ponder dried mud that should be deep beneath Lake Mendocino in this April 21, 2021 file photo, courtesy California DW

Sonoma County officials are awaiting state permission to cut the amount of water flowing down the Russian River as local reservoirs continue receding.

The Russian River may soon have more of the look and feel of a creek. Local officials are awaiting word from state regulators over an emergency plan that would see water levels dip by more than half, hoping to buttress sinking levels at both Lake Mendocino and Lake Sonoma, the river's major sources.

In their emergency petition, officials are seeking an OK to cut minimum releases by as much as 60 percent.  That could equal about 35 cubic feet per second.

Sonoma County Water warns that without a waiver from current requirements, Lake Mendocino would be emptied by mid-September, about two months before the onset of the rainy season.

The State Water Quality Control Board meets Tuesday, but the item is not scheduled for consideration. However, the waiver from environmental rules regarding flow rates appears likely. According to board data, critical drought conditions' exist when levels at Lake Mendocino are below 51,000 acre feet on May 16th of any year. According to Sonoma Water, the reservoir has dipped below 39,000.

If the waiver is approved, flow rates on the river between Dry Creek and the ocean would be three and a half times lower than normal.

 

Pacific Gas and Electric Company has sparked some of the state’s deadliest wildfires. The company pled guilty to 84 counts of involuntary manslaughter after the 2018 Camp Fire. It faces felony charges in connection with the 2019 Kincade Fire in Sonoma County and is being investigated for murder in Shasta County, after the Zogg Fire.

The record that led a federal judge earlier this year to declare that "PG&E has been a terror — T-E-R-R-O-R — to the people of California.”

Epic fires in recent years have highlighted the urgency of preparation, and spotlighted vast vulnerabilities. We wanted to get a better understanding of how dangerous the company’s power lines are heading into wildfire season, which given hot, dry conditions is expected to be among the most dangerous on record.

So we created a map that highlighted the riskiest power lines in PG&E’s grid, taken from a recent audit by the California Public Utilities Commission Wildfire Safety Division, and layered that on top of a heat map provided by a CPUC heat map that shows areas at “extreme” and “elevated” wildfire danger this year. We’ve also mapped the electric circuits where PG&E believes there is the greatest risk of a tree catching fire by catching sparks from a power line or hitting a utility pole.

 

Now, we want your help assessing wildfire risk. If you are concerned about the safety of power lines in your area, please email pictures of the lines, together with your contact information and the street address or cross-street of the image, to This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.. We promise not to publish or reveal any personal information without securing your approval first. We will assess your photographs for compliance with state law and may share them, along with the geographic information you provide with PG&E, CALFire, and the CPUC. 

Here’s what PG&E is required to do, and what you should look for:

In its audit, the California Public Utilities Commission said PG&E, "appears to not be sufficiently prioritizing or reducing the risk of wildfire ignition.”

As of January, the commission said, PG&E had failed to do any vegetation mitigation work on many of its highest risk circuits, including some areas of the Wine Country, Sierra Foothills, and Santa Cruz Mountains.

In an emailed statement, PG&E spokesperson Lynsey Paulo responded to the audit saying “we have more to do, and we are committed to doing it the right way.” On May 6, the company issued a 196-page “corrective action plan”  acknowledging its vegetation management plan “had gaps and shortcomings.” 

In its response, the company said it had “undertaken efforts and initiatives” to improve the safety of its grid.

State law requires PG&E to follow two basic rules during the state-designated fire season.

Keep Tree Limbs Away from Electric Wires

All foliage must be cleared within four feet of power lines of between 2,400 and 72,000 volts (most regular electric lines). The rule expands to 10 feet on higher-voltage lines and requires the removal of “dead, diseased, defective and dying trees” that could fall onto the lines.

Maintain Distance Between Trees and Utility Poles

PG&E is required to maintain a firebreak of at least 10 feet from utility poles, with tree limbs of within the 10-foot radius of the pole removed up to eight feet above the ground. In other words, even if a tree trunk is more than 10 feet away, its branches should not reach close to the pole until they are more than eight feet off the ground. This is to prevent the pole itself from catching fire.

There are exceptions to both of these rules, and they do not apply in every part of the state. The areas where they do apply are called the State Responsibility Area; it includes most parts of California that are at heightened risk of wildfire and not owned by the federal government.

Inspecting the Lines, Getting Results

Before asking you to photograph the lines, we tried it out ourselves. In late April, we sent a reporter, Marc Albert of Northern California Public Media, out to drive a high-risk section of the grid in Western Sonoma County, an area of “extreme” wildfire risk, according to CalFIRE. He went armed with a camera and copies of government regulations describing how those lines are to be kept safe.

Albert found a number of power lines that appeared to violate these regulations. On Harrison Grade and Green Valley Roads northwest of Sebastopol, he found oaks and redwoods with branches that appeared to be precariously close to electric current.

The oak trees were also very close to the utility poles, despite a state law that requires a clear, 10-foot radius around poles in most rural areas that are not on federal land. The same rule also requires that all tree branches in the zone be removed up to eight feet above the ground, which was not the case. 

On nearby Joy Road, the reporter found more concerning evidence of risk: a live oak tree so close to utility poles that they practically wrapped around them. The photographs he took concerned independent fire experts we consulted, so we brought them to PG&E.

Paulo, the PG&E spokesperson, shared them with her company’s vegetation management unit and responded that they were in compliance with all relevant state laws. Nevertheless, crews were dispatched to trim a tree whose branches appeared to be dangerously close to the lines.

In the case of the first tree, with branches that appeared too close to the lines, the company had them trimmed back.

Paulo said a “laser range finder” determined that the branches were farther than four feet from the lines, but nevertheless ordered a work crew to trim them.

The company gave us a different response to the lack of space between the trees and the poles, and the fact that in multiple cases branches were making contact with the pole at heights close to the ground. In both cases, Paulo said the poles we photographed were not covered by state law by a CalFIRE rule exempting equipment that “is completely sealed and liquid-filled.”

We contacted both CalFIRE and the California Public Utilities Commission seeking clarity on this point.

“The equipment I saw and photographed appeared to be a standard 12KV line. I did not see anything that would indicate to me that the equipment was either ‘completely sealed’ or ‘liquid-filled,” reporter Marc Albert wrote to the CPUC.

“We will look into this,” the CPUC spokesperson, Terrie Prosper responded.

Email any photos you take, together with your location to This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.. Note: If you smell natural gas, see downed power lines or suspect another emergency situation, leave the area immediately and call 911. Then, call PG&E at 1-800-743-5000.

This story is a collaborative project of NPR’s California Newsroom, including Northern California Public Media, Cap Radio, and KQED. Aaron Glantz is senior investigations editor for NPR’s California Newsroom, where George LeVines is a data reporter. Marc Albert is a reporter for Northern California Public Media. Lisa Pickoff-White is a data journalist at KQED. Chris Hagan is managing editor for digital content at CapRadio.

Image courtesy CalFireAs Sonoma County's fire season starts, state and local officials are pitching strategies and programs aimed at making homes more fire resistant.

When fire rages out of control, few things survive. But smartly-built homes with fewer vulnerabilities have a fighting chance.

On Thursday, in a pitch to encourage homeowners to go beyond ‘defensible space,’ State Insurance Commissioner Ricardo Lara announced the first fruits of efforts to collaborate with fire officials and home insurers to reduce vulnerabilities to wildfire.

Novato Fire District Chief Bill Tyler, who took part in the virtual workshop, says recent fires have revealed weaknesses in construction that help spread flames from forests to neighborhoods.

“It’s branches and embers that are showering from fires that could be a quarter mile away and they are landing on people’s ornamental vegetation, and they are landing on the roofs and they are hitting the vents, gathering in nooks and crannies of the house and they are starting fires.”

Funded by a local property tax measure, Tyler says his department has hired five inspectors--looking for things like roof eaves and vents with mesh too big to block embers.

The program provides matching funds to help defray costs of what's called ‘home hardening.’ And making sure the work is completed. Tyler says some homeowners, initially contacting the district over concerns about neighboring properties, learn a few uncomfortable truths.

“They are surprised to learn that the type of plants that they’ve had, that is drought resistant, deer resistant, that they haven’t had to do a lot of work on, suddenly is like a gasoline can sitting next to the side of the house.”

Lara is working to convince insurers to become more involved with home hardening efforts, as they’d potentially benefit from covering fewer losses. He says for now he’s gotten eight insurers, along with the state’s FAIR plan, an insurer of last resort, to discount home insurance rates on homes where vulnerabilities have been addressed. Lara said those firms account for 13 percent of California’s home insurance market.

For home hardening basics from CalFire: https://www.readyforwildfire.org/prepare-for-wildfire/get-ready/hardening-your-home/