Hearken1 English

ByRicardo Cano, CalMatters

State lawmakers are one step closer to plugging a technical loophole that has allowed California school districts to divert funds intended for needy kids to other purposes.

A legislative panel unanimously advanced a proposal that would strengthen oversight of how the state’s school districts spend money designated for needy students, making it one of the few surviving bills as the coronavirus pandemic has upended the state’s education agenda.

Assembly 1835 by Democratic Assemblywoman Shirley Weber of San Diego stems from a years-long effort to bolster transparency of the state’s landmark 2013 school finance law, the Local Control Funding Formula.

Advocates of the proposal have long argued that the law, intended to close gaps in student achievement, has lacked the necessary teeth to ensure districts appropriately spend additional funding meant for disadvantaged students.

But the proposal encountered new opposition from a group of school officials who argued that school districts need as much flexibility as possible to navigate looming steep budget cuts induced by the coronavirus pandemic. Experts and state lawmakers have warned schools of potential cuts in state funding greater than those during the Great Recession that resulted in mass teacher layoffs and years of painful cuts for schools.

(Image: Assemblymember Shirley Weber advocated for the Local Control Funding Formula in 2013, and now wants to close a loophole in the system. Photo by Anne Wernikoff for CalMatters)

Weber and supporters of AB 1835 said at a Wednesday morning hearing at the Capitol that the budgetary landscape only adds urgency for passing the proposal. Schools with high percentages of disadvantaged students, they said, experienced the brunt of last decade’s cuts, and they stand to be in a similarly vulnerable position without the legislation.

Weber, who lobbied legislators to pass the Local Control Funding Formula seven years ago, said she empathized with schools’ financial concerns, but said that the proposed changes remain long overdue.

“Even in good times for the last seven years, these kids have not benefited from these dollars because we have not held the districts accountable for using the money as it should have been spent,” Weber said. “We could not afford to once again fail these kids. Even in this pandemic, they are suffering the most.”

Signed into law by Gov. Jerry Brown in 2013, the formula overhauled how school districts in California receive funding. It replaced a system that was criticized for being inflexible and imposing strings for how schools could spend money.

The Local Control Funding Formula, which remains popular among school officials and education advocates, gave districts greater control in determining school spending while giving extra funding to districts with higher concentrations of students who are English learners, economically disadvantaged or foster youth.

Under the new formula, each school district receives a flat, per-student base grant. Districts with higher proportions of needy students receive additional funds with the expectation that schools direct those dollars toward disadvantaged students.

But the November state audit found that the law hasn’t done enough to ensure that districts are appropriately spending that money. The state audit, which renewed the effort to boost the law’s transparency, highlighted that unspent supplemental and concentration funds lose their designation after one year, essentially allowing districts to use those rollover funds for across-the-board expenses, such as teacher pay.

Wednesday marked the first time the Assembly Education Committee gathered since Gov. Gavin Newsom issued statewide stay at home orders on March 19. The legislative panel took up only a fraction of the bills it had been slated to consider this session as legislators shift their focus toward a budgetary landscape significantly different than the one the governor presented earlier in the year.

Prior to the pandemic, the state was on rosy economic footing, boasting a $21 billion surplus with plans to invest a record $84 billion for K-12 schools and community colleges. A revised budget later this month is expected to show a completely different picture, and school officials have warned that programs and services across the board will likely be affected by cuts.

Jeff Vaca, chief governmental relations officer for the Riverside County Office of Education, told lawmakers Wednesday that the county’s districts were not planning to oppose the bill. But, with tough financial decisions on the horizon, “we regretfully must oppose the bill because we believe it will make it more difficult to achieve our pledge and mission.”

“We will do everything humanly possible to prioritize and preserve programs for disadvantaged and at-risk students, and to mitigate the loss of learning that the crisis has already caused,” Vaca said before lawmakers advanced the bill. “But it is a certainty that all programs and services will be significantly impacted by the forthcoming recession.”

AB 1835 is among a handful of education proposals that will advance this session. The Assembly Education Committee had been scheduled to hear more than 140 proposals this session, though the panel took up only 13 bills in its sole scheduled hearing before a May 29 deadline.

CalMatters.org is a nonprofit, nonpartisan media venture explaining California policies and politics.

Sonoma County’s Superintendent of Schools says the state’s landmark budget shortfall brought on by the coronavirus pandemic will pose “incredible financial challenges” for local schools in the coming year.

Superintendent Steve Herrington’s remarks come a day after Gov. Gavin Newsom shared his revised budget proposal, which features significant cuts to California’s K-12 schools and community colleges.

Herrington said the county Office of Education and local school districts run many programs, including CTE, workforce development, teacher development and special education preschool initiatives, that could see significant cuts as a result of certain grants or funding categories being scaled back. He also noted that all school districts will see a 10 percent cut in the Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF) funding that makes up the bulk of their budgets.

“These cuts will pose tremendous challenges at a time when districts are already underfunded and being asked to undertake costly social distancing measures in the fall, while also contending with declining enrollment,” he said.

Herrington said he strongly supports the governor’s call for federal aid to compensate for the state’s $54 billion deficit caused by record job losses. The Heroes Act proposal unveiled by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi asks the federal government for nearly $1 trillion for local and state governments.

Herrington said the county will be working closely with school districts to balance budgets, provide core student services and ensure student and staff safety.

“While these challenges are considerable, I have confidence that local school leaders will do everything they can do to ensure that all students receive the best education possible in the year ahead,” he said. “Now more than ever, our public schools are a critical component of the fabric of our society. Until school campuses reopen, our workforce cannot return and the economy cannot begin to rebound.” 

Additional businesses can reopen in Sonoma County, including car washes, pet groomers and outdoor museums, under an amended shelter-in-place order that went into effect Friday.

The local changes follow Gov. Gavin Newsom’s statewide announcement Tuesday that more businesses could operate with health safety modifications as the fight against COVID-19 continues.

Under the amended order, the following businesses are allowed to operate and people are permitted to leave home and travel to work in or patronize them:

• car washes
• pet groomers
• dog walking services
• residential and janitorial cleaning services
• outdoor museums
• open air galleries
• botanical gardens
• and other outdoor exhibition spaces

The amended order also allows people to go back to work if telecommuting is not possible, and allows childcare facilities to open to those outside the essential workforce, following strict health protocols.

The order specifically lists businesses that must remain closed, which are: outdoor restaurants, cafes, or bars, zoos, amusement parks, indoor gallery and museum spaces, and personal care services that have close customer contact, including hair salons, barbershops, nail salons, massage parlors, aestheticians and cosmetology, ear piercing salons and tattoo parlors.

All storefront and indoor mall access remains closed to the public, though curbside pick-up, delivery and shipping are allowed.

The Sonoma County Economic Development Board has a new website offering resources for businesses on how to safely and successfully reopen. Industry-specific guidance from the governor’s office on reopening can be found here.

Find updates on Sonoma County’s response to the coronavirus pandemic at socoemergency.org.

ByElizabeth Aguilera, CalMatters

Gov. Gavin Newsom promised that the state’s new child care website would give essential workers all the information they need to choose a provider for their kids.

It isn’t quite working out that way.

The portal Newsom announced a week ago, based on state licensing data, lacks key information. In many instances, hours of operation and available spots are missing. The site doesn’t indicate whether providers accept subsidies or what they charge.

The number of complaints about a provider initially was listed, but the state removed that information within days of the portal’s debut. Citations also are absent. To find that crucial information, a user would need to locate and then click on the license number — which then links to the state’s main licensing database.

(Image: Amanda Simoni, owner of Heritage School of Discovery in Oakdale, laughs while students play in the school yard mud pit. A new California child care website aims to connect essential workers with available options. Photo by Anne Wernikoff for CalMatters)

Across California, 72% of child care is provided by licensed private businesses — large centers and small and large family home care sites, accounting for nearly 1 million child care slots. Of those, 35% have a state or federal contract, such as Head Start. The rest get paid directly by parents or via vouchers.

Newsom said the portal was created to help working parents track down child care during the COVID-19 pandemic. The state’s shelter-in-place order never required private child care and preschool centers to close, but many have shut down for safety reasons or falling enrollment. Relatives who may have provided care or been backup babysitters are now in isolation, and schools are out for the foreseeable future.

But the portal is not proving to be a one-stop shop, said Nina Buthee, executive director of EveryChild California, a statewide organization supporting early childhood education programs with 1,500 members. 

“Any parent would still need to make quite a few phone calls and reach out to a number of different places,” Buthee said.  

Instead, she called the new California child care website a “really good start for finding out where facilities are.”

The new portal allows a user to enter an address or zip code to see a map of nearby centers as well as a list of providers. From there a parent can choose a provider and access whatever information is available. The portal lists 41,000 sites and 464 new pop-up child care locations. 

The state Department of Social Services already had a licensing database that is searchable, but it is more complex and doesn’t provide availability information.

“The purpose of the portal is to provide child care options that are convenient and reliable for their families located near their work, home or preferred location,” department spokesman Scott Murray said in an email. 

About the missing information, Murray said the department is contacting providers regularly through an automated system to get updates regarding availability. If a center does not respond to text, email or phone calls the site indicates “availability unknown.”

Originally the new portal included the number of complaints a child care provider has received but the state removed that information within three days. Murray said that element was cut because the page has a link to the original licensing site, where users can explore complaints, citations and facility inspection reports. 

Buthee said if the goal was to create the informative, user-friendly site that Newsom promised, it should include a list of recent citations and complaints with the date, reason and resolution. Or instead, the site should explicitly explain what parents can find if they follow the link to the licensing data.

Ironically, there is a more in-depth child care database in the works. In July, a long-awaited multi-million dollar website will launch that includes in-depth information and resources for families. This project was created in response to the requirements of a Child Care Development Block Grant the state received in 2014.

The website was fully funded in last year’s budget, according to Keisha Nzewi, director of public policy for the California Child Care Resource and Referral Network, which holds the contract and is building the site.

“It’s good to have something up,” said Nzewi about the state portal. “I wish people could see how beautiful and user friendly this site is going to be. I wish COVID had held off or we had enough money to do this sooner.”

For now, the referral network is working with the state to infuse the portal with some of the features from the new site, like a more robust database of providers and availability.  

The current California child care website has disappointed some parents and providers alike.

“It’s really bad,” said San Francisco mom Maria Jandres. “That portal doesn’t give you any information. It doesn’t say where they are, how many spaces. For a new parent it has nothing. It leaves you more lost and with even more questions.”

Jandres said her 4-year-old son’s regular child care site closed in March, around the time her work as a Realtor and court translator was coming to a slow stop. She stayed home with him for three weeks before signing up as a food delivery driver for various apps. She now juggles his care with her partner when he is not working. 

“We have to figure out our child care because we don’t have anyone else,” she said.  “Without child care neither my partner or I would be able to survive.”

At the same time, she said she is afraid to send her child to a provider she doesn’t already know, even if there are slots for essential workers. She’d rather ask around in her community for a personal recommendation.

This comes as no surprise to preschool owner Amanda Simoni, who went from having 54 kids every day to the 10 she is taking care of now at Heritage School of Discovery in Oakdale. She said she has laid off half of her staff and hopes to bring them back as soon as more kids return.

Simoni said California’s new child care website “came too late and it does not give enough information.”

She reached out to her local nonprofit child care agency after perusing the site and finding her phone number was wrong. It also included three complaints against her program, all of which were three or more years old and had been resolved, she said.

Simoni said parents should have all the information, but it should be listed in a comprehensive way.  As is, she said, the portal is “just not giving accurate information, it’s not giving parents the opportunity to make a good decision.”

For parents seeking child care sites that are much smaller than Heritage School, and are operated out of a provider’s home, this portal is going to require some additional hoops.

These so-called “small family homes,” where providers care for up to eight kids, are listed without the official name of the business, address or contact information.  Department spokesman Murray said that the contact information is not listed for privacy reasons because these are individual homes. So in order to reach these providers, parents would have to call their local nonprofit referral agency that oversees child care.

Those extra steps could thwart a connection between a family and a small child care provider.

“They need to have as much of an advantage as anyone else,” Buthee said.

Child care advocates hope to resolve all of these concerns with the new site. 

Eventually, any searches will direct web traffic to the new site, Nzewi said. She said she expects the need to find child care to continue to grow into the summer, as some centers reduce enrollment to meet social distancing guidelines — or close altogether.

“It’s going to become even more important for parents and providers,” she said. “Parents will have to seek out new care.”

CalMatters.org is a nonprofit, nonpartisan media venture explaining California policies and politics.

ByLaurel Rosenhall andJackie Botts, CalMatters

How does a liberal, blue-state governor take on the unappealing task of slashing the budget? By shifting a lot of the pressure to the federal government.

In revising California’s budget down to $203 billion Thursday, Gov. Gavin Newsom charted a plan to fill a huge deficit by tying many cuts to additional federal aid. If the feds come through with $1 trillion for state and local governments that Newsom and other Democratic governors have requested, California would not reduce funding to schools, colleges, parks, child care, health care and other programs.

“The President of the United States, with a stroke of the pen, could provide support for Nancy Pelosi’s new HEROES Act and these cuts could be eliminated,” Newsom said, as he presented his proposal to close a $54 billion deficit brought on by record job losses during the coronavirus pandemic.

It’s a strategic, if risky, course as Newsom heads into a sprint of budget negotiations with state lawmakers over the next four weeks. 

(Image: File photo by Anne Wernikoff for CalMatters)

On the one hand: Newsom’s proposed cuts will likely unleash an outpouring of advocacy from sympathetic constituencies including teachers, firefighters and police that could influence decisions in the nation’s capital. Newsom enjoys longstanding ties to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, a fellow San Francisco Democrat whose father-in-law was business partners with Newsom’s grandfather. And despite feuds with Donald Trump that defined much of Newsom’s first year in office, he has developed a working relationship with the president. They have been publicly praising each other since the pandemic began. 

On the other: GOP Senate leader Mitch McConnell has already rejected Pelosi’s latest aid package and previously said he wouldn’t support any “blue state bailouts.” Federal aid at the level Newsom would like — not to mention passage before cuts to the state budget would take effect on July 1 — is hardly a sure thing.

“We do need to have a Plan B,” said Assemblyman Phil Ting, a San Francisco Democrat who chairs the Assembly budget committee.

“I don’t think we should only rely on the federal government… If the federal money doesn’t come through, we should think about other options before we go to cuts.”

Ting’s counterpart in the state Senate sounded more optimistic that Congress would come through and that Newsom’s proposed cuts would not come to pass. 

“The programs that he’s attached to the trigger hopefully will create a wonderful advocacy opportunity for beneficiaries of those programs to reach out to our congressional representatives to make sure that the state gets the resources they need so we don’t have to cut those areas,” said state Sen. Holly Mitchell, a Los Angeles Democrat.

Indeed, within hours of Newsom’s announcement, the California Teachers Association began asking Californians to call their members of Congress and urge passage of Pelosi’s aid package.  

Lawmakers will now sift through Newsom’s proposal before they must pass a budget on June 15. GOP Sen. Jim Nielsen of Tehama quickly rejected Newsom’s approach, saying “relying on federal bailouts is not a budget solution.” 

But Republicans make up just a quarter of the Legislature, not a large enough bloc to be influential in budget negotiations.

Most Democrats in the Legislature Thursday were elected since the last recession and now face their first bleak budget. Up until the coronavirus outbreak, California had enjoyed the longest economic recovery since the Great Recession. After raising taxes in 2012, the state managed its finances prudently in good years, paying off a $35 billion “wall of debt” from internal borrowing schemes and building up significant reserves — all of which helped improve the state’s credit rating.

Still, public employee pensions have since reported record losses. That has local officials fearful of service cuts, layoffs and even bankruptcy because state and local governments are obligated to contribute more — even when they have less. CalPERS, for example, shed $69 billion as the global financial market recoiled from the pandemic.  

And former Gov. Jerry Brown, a doomsayer who paddled right of many legislative Democrats in seeking fiscal restraint throughout his second tenure, warned in his final state budget that the good times wouldn’t last forever.

“What’s out there is darkness, uncertainty, decline and recession,” Brown said in 2018. “So good luck, baby!”

The Newsom administration projects 24.5% unemployment, a 21% decline in new housing permits and a nearly 9% drop in California personal income for the fiscal year starting July 1. It’s a stark turnaround from January, when the governor laid out an ambitious agenda featuring a $5.6 billion surplus.

Newsom acknowledged all of that has disappeared “in a blink of an eye” as he walked back many of his January proposals. The governor dropped a plan to extend Medi-Cal health coverage to low-income undocumented seniors over 65 — a move that could cause friction with legislative Democrats hoping to support a community more vulnerable to the virus. 

“Immigrants are the backbone of our state and have been serving as essential workers throughout this crisis,” Assemblywoman Lorena Gonzalez, a San Diego Democrat, said in a statement. “We are disappointed, but not surprised by the Governor’s actions to go backward on health for all.”

The crisis, however, may present opportunities for Newsom. He had proposed closing one prison in the next five years. Now he wants to close two prisons, one in 2021 and another in 2022. That will likely put him in conflict with the prison guards union that has traditionally wielded clout at the Capitol, but if Newsom is successful he would burnish his progressive bona fides in any future political campaign.

Broadly, the governor called for bridging the deficit by canceling non-essential spending, tapping reserves and borrowing. Among his proposals:

• Canceling $6.1 billion in program expansions and spending increases, including  stopping a $2.4 billion extra payment to the California Public Employees’ Retirement System. 
• Drawing down $16.2 billion from the state’s main rainy day fund over three years, and tapping a safety net reserve to offset increased costs in health and human services programs over the next two years.
• Moving $4.1 billion between accounts to help balance the budget, on paper at least.
• Temporarily suspending and capping tax credits used by businesses and wealthy taxpayers. Specifically, suspend net operating losses and limit to $5 million the amount a taxpayer can claim in credits in any given tax year. The move would generate $4.4 billion in 2020-21 to increase funding for schools and community colleges and maintain other core services. 

California could look to its taxpayers in other ways as well, though it’s unclear whether voters will be in a mood to help. Labor and education groups are pushing a November ballot measure to overhaul Proposition 13, California’s landmark property tax cap, to help prevent steeper cuts to local governments and public schools. The Schools and Communities First campaign estimates the initiative could bring in $12 billion a year by raising commercial property taxes.

Newsom has not endorsed the proposal, which business interests vehemently oppose, but said he hasn’t ruled out asking voters for some kind of tax increase.

“We are considering other approaches, including other revenue strategies,” he said.  “We will  pursue conversations with the Legislature, with leaders all up and down the state and we hope we can help guide some consensus about what is most appropriate to put forward to the voters.”

In the meantime, about 26% of Newsom’s budget solutions rely on cuts he said would be eliminated if enough federal aid comes through. 

“We are doing our best to help support people in need, but we now need the federal government to support not only the state of California, but other states across this country,” Newsom said. “If they do, if they meet this moment, we will be able to significantly reduce the stress and anxiety many are feeling.”

In other words: Washington, the ball’s in your court. 

CalMatters.org is a nonprofit, nonpartisan media venture explaining California policies and politics.

ByBen Christopher, CalMatters

California provides.

That’s the message that Gov. Gavin Newsom has been sending to the rest of the country over the last week. For those short on ventilators, the Golden State will share its mechanical bounty, sending hundreds to New York, New Jersey and Illinois, ferried by California’s uniformed National Guard. 

For those who lack protective masks, California — as per an announcement he made on MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow show Tuesday night — will be amassing 200 million per month. Enough to meet the state’s needs. And maybe your state’s too. 

“We need to coordinate and organize our nation-state status as we can, only in California with our procurement capacity that is quite literally second only to the United States,” the governor told reporters this afternoon. California would act as “a catalyst to increase supply” not only for the state’s health care workers, but for those in other states and perhaps other countries “across the globe.” 

“That’s how we perceive our role.”

(Image: California Gov. Gavin Newsom / File photo by Anne Wernikoff for CalMatters)

Newsom’s offer to share California’s public health resources surely makes for good public health policy. No doubt, sharing extra health equipment during a pandemic is also good karma. 

But it’s also good politics. Unsurprisingly Newsom, widely believed to harbor national political ambitions, refuses to characterize it in those terms.

“This is not political, this is not in any way, shape or form usurping or undermining, this is all in the spirit of all of us stepping into this moment and doing what we can,” he said in response to a question from CalMatters. “California is just uniquely resourced.”

In another crisis or under a different president, that’s a role one might expect of the White House. After spending the first weeks after the novel coronavirus made landfall in the United States downplaying its severity, President Donald Trump has since taken a rather hands-off approach when it comes to providing necessary supplies, coordinating purchases of protective equipment or using national emergency powers to force manufacturers to produce more of it.  

Federalism or Darwinism?

“Try getting it yourselves,” the president advised state governors in a conference call in mid-March, a decentralized approach that former Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley described as “a Darwinian approach to federalism.”

With the federal government receding, governors’ offices have attained a new kind of prominence, said California political analyst Sherry Bebitch Jeffe.

“We’re returning to the Articles of Confederation where the federal government is just there for war and printing money,” she said. “It’s the local and state governments — the governors — that are moving into the vacuum and creating the leadership and exercising the power in this crisis.”

For at least a decade, political focus and news coverage has been increasingly nationalized, with governorships, once a predictable stepping stone to the White House, fading from public view, she said. No longer.

On daytime television, “they are interrupting even the soap operas at noon to carry Newsom live,” she said. “I’ve never seen that!”

In that respect, Newsom still can’t compete with the star power of New York Gov.  Andrew Cuomo. Chief executive of the state that has been hardest hit by the pandemic — and which is home to some of the country’s most prominent television and print news — Cuomo’s widely televised daily briefings have earned him a degree of national trust that seems to rival the president’s.

According to a Monmouth University poll conducted in the first week of April, 23% of respondents named Cuomo as the public official they trust most to deal with the pandemic. 20% put their trust in Trump. Only 3% named Newsom.

That may change now that Newsom is suggesting he could come to the rescue of some other states if California has spares from its equipment bounty. It’s yet another way that California’s governor has distinguished himself from his counterparts in other states. Newsom was the first to call for a statewide shelter-in-place order, issuing the edict days before Washington, New York and Louisiana and weeks before Arizona and Florida. In the weeks since, there are faint signs that California may escape the worst ravages of the virus — though it’s still too early to say whether Newsom and local leaders can take credit.

“Showing the world what makes our state great”

Another contrast in leadership styles: Amid a coronavirus outbreak aboard the Grand Princess cruise ship, Newsom coordinated with Oakland Mayor Libby Schaaf and the Trump administration to offload and quarantine the passengers in the Bay Area. He praised Schaaf and other local elected leaders for “showing the world what makes our state great — coming to the rescue of thousands of people trapped aboard this ship and helping tackle a national emergency.”

In Florida, where cruise ships loaded with sick passengers await disembarkation, Gov. Rob DeSantis said the state would only accept the Floridians. 

In announcing his new plan this afternoon, Newsom evoked his Jesuit education.

“The Bible teaches us we are many parts, but one body,” he said. “Father Coz was my econ teacher at Santa Clara University and he began every single lecture by reminding us of our web of mutuality.”

Not everyone has applauded Newsom’s generosity. With hundreds of California ventilators lent out to other states in need, Riverside County Supervisor Kevin Jeffries, a former Republican legislator, told The Los Angeles Times that he worried whether regional hospitals would “be able to get the assistance that we’re going to need in a week or two weeks out.”

For now, plans to produce hundreds of millions of new masks and potentially provide them to other states remains a hypothetical.

Newsom said that a number of governors had welcomed his plan to mass-purchase equipment and share California’s excess “because they understand we are helping increase supply, we are not taking away a limited number of supplies.” 

Newsom’s office has not yet responded to the question of which other states he was referring to.

Tara Lee, a spokesperson for Washington Democratic Gov. Jay Inslee, said in a statement that “Governor Newsom has expressed his hope that the California procurement system will soon be in a sufficiently strong position that they could share some of the opportunities with other states, and Gov. Inslee looks forward to discussing that.”

New Jersey Democratic Gov. Phil Murphy already has welcomed California’s ventilators:

ByMatt Levin, CalMatters

As California scrambles to protect more than 150,000 homeless residents from contracting and spreading novel coronavirus, Gov. Gavin Newsom had some harsh words Saturday for cities he accused of blocking the conversion of hotels and motels for emergency housing. 

After touting the 10,974 vacant hotel rooms the state has acquired so far in a partnership with the federal government — roughly 4,200 of which are now occupied with homeless residents — Newsom charged some municipalities that have resisted the initiative with letting “not-in-my-backyard” politics interfere with a public health imperative. 

(Image: A row of hotels and motels near Oakland airport on March 25. Gov. Gavin Newsom is encouraging cities to convert hotels into emergency housing to protect the homeless from COVID-19. Photo by Anne Wernikoff for CalMatters)

“I just want to encourage those cities that are blocking efforts like this to consider themselves in the context of others…to consider their actions in the context and annals of history,” said Newsom, speaking outside a Motel 6 in Silicon Valley that will be repurposed for the homeless. “They’ll judge themselves, not just be judged by others, by the extent they help the least among us.” 

While Newsom declined to name specific problematic cities and praised others he said were eager to participate, his remarks suggest that the state’s unprecedented effort to convert hotel rooms to homeless housing has run up against a barrier beyond even the massive logistical hurdles of acquiring and staffing the hotels: political and legal challenges from local elected officials reluctant to allow COVID-19 positive and symptomatic homeless to be housed in their communities. 

Resistance to the hotel initiative has surfaced most publicly in Southern California. The cities of Laguna Woods and Laguna Hills in Orange County, and Lawndale and Bell Gardens in Los Angeles County, have mounted legal challenges to hotels that inked emergency deals with county governments. 

State, county and local governments across California have long fought over where homeless housing should be located, with few neighborhoods volunteering to devote land and resources to a population many residents associate with crime, mental illness and declining property values. 

As the state prioritizes hotel rooms for the homeless who have tested positive for the virus or are symptomatic, a potent cocktail of fear is developing in some neighborhoods, say homelessness advocates. 

“What is at stake right now takes this outside the realm of a conversation about NIMBYism,” said Shayla Myers, attorney for the Legal Aid Foundation of Los Angeles. “I think Gavin Newsom made the moral argument.” 

A spokesman for the League of California Cities, which represents municipal interests in the Capitol, declined to comment on Newsom’s remarks. 

Myers says that while she applauds Newsom’s rhetoric, homelessness advocates wish the governor would exercise more of the emergency powers granted to him during the pandemic to commandeer hotels or override zoning rules and other state and local laws cities use to mount legal challenges. 

“The governor of the state of California has extraordinary authority in this moment of time to take concrete steps to address this emergency,” Myers said. “He is not using that authority to protect unhoused residents of this state.” 

Beyond the admonishments to reluctant cities, Newsom on Saturday announced a partnership with Motel 6 that could include 5,000 more rooms in 47 motels across the state. While the state has negotiated a lease template with Motel 6, counties will ultimately determine whether to utilize the rooms. 

Our most vulnerable unsheltered neighbors need protection from #COVID19.

Today Governor @GavinNewsom announced a partnership with Motel 6 & secured up to 5k+ more rooms for Project Roomkey. #StayHomeSaveLives https://t.co/WQQ2trCN5B

— Office of the Governor of California (@CAgovernor) April 18, 2020

The agreement with Motel 6 includes language that Newsom said will allow local governments to convert the sites into permanent homeless housing once the pandemic subsides. 

Speaking with Newsom, San Jose Mayor Sam Liccardo said he hopes new rounds of federal funding will allow cash-strapped cities to avoid sending people who are homeless back to the streets. The Federal Emergency Management Agency has agreed to pay 75% of the cost of the motels during the pandemic, but funding after the emergency order is lifted is uncertain. 

“We don’t want these rooms simply open for a few weeks or a few months; let’s give counties and cities the dollars they need to purchase motels so we can really aggressively address the homelessness crisis that will be here well beyond the time this pandemic passes,” Liccardo said. 

In another sign that the pandemic is still not close to passing, Newsom reported that an additional 87 people had died as a result of COVID-19 in the past 24 hours, taking the state’s total death toll from the pandemic past 1,000, and that hospitalizations for the disease had ticked up 1.3%. The number being treated in intensive care units was little changed.

CalMatters.org is a nonprofit, nonpartisan media venture explaining California policies and politics.

Adia White, NorCal Public Media

Updated July 2, 2020

 

Sonoma County's coronavirus death toll climbed to nine Wednesday night. The data was reported on the county's website socoemergency.org.  This has been the deadliest week in the county with four people dying from the virus since Sunday, June 28. 

 

State data shows that 22 residents have tested positive for coronavirus at Broadway Villa Post Acute. According to the Press Democrat, two of the recent deaths were residents at Broadway Villa.  Other skilled nursing homes with coronavirus cases include Petaluma Post-Acute Rehab. According to state data, that facility has fewer than 11 cases though the data does not specify exactly how many.

 

 

Counties across California have seen an increase in cases and fatalities, prompting the state Department of Public Health to order nineteen counties to shut down all indoor restaurants, wineries, movie theaters, zoos, and family entertainment centers. Indoor and outdoor bars were also ordered to shut down. Sonoma County is currently not on the state's watchlist, but Health Officer Dr. Sundari Mase said Wednesday that the county could soon meet those criteria and be ordered to close down some businesses. A case rate of over 100 cases per 100,000 residents could trigger mandatory restrictions and business closures from the state. Sonoma County currently has a case rate of 86.6 per 100,000 residents as of July 2, according to its website.

 

On Wednesday Health Officer Dr. Sundari Mase also highlighted several other triggers that have sparked concern, including the number of available ICU beds. According to the county's website, there are 10 ICU beds available with 57 occupied.

The County of Sonoma's website reported 49 new coronavirus cases Tuesday and 44 new cases on Wednesday.  There are now 1,229 total cases in the county. That number includes 620  people who have recovered from the virus.

 

For more information on cases, hospitalizations and demographic data in Sonoma County visit socoemergency.org. 

 

This article will be updated as more information becomes available. 

 

 

 

When hundreds gathered outside the state Capitol earlier this spring, demanding that Gov. Gavin Newsom reopen the state’s economy, some made clear they also had another message for him: You can’t make us wear a mask. One protester held a sign comparing face masks to dog muzzles, and many chanted and mingled without any type of face covering. 

 

But after weeks of mixed messaging and leaving the decision of implementing mask mandates up to counties, the state today said face coverings will be required after all. 

 

“Science shows that face coverings and masks work,” Newsom said in a statement. “They are critical to keeping those who are around you safe, keeping businesses open and restarting our economy.” 

 

Newsom, who has preached localism on many coronavirus-related matters, has often explained that a one-size-fits-all approach doesn’t work in a state with 40 million people. But as the state reopens and coronavirus cases and hospitalizations climb in some parts, a statewide mask order can perhaps make a difference in controlling further spread, some public health and county officials have said. 

 

Californians must now wear a face covering when interacting with other members of the public, and while in any indoor public space, as well as when in line to enter such spaces. These include pharmacies, a doctor’s office and the vet’s office. People must also wear a face covering while riding on public transportation, including a bus or a ride-share service, like Lyft or Uber. 

 

The state’s new rules don’t require face masks for children 2 and under and for people with a medical or developmental disability. People also don’t have to wear a mask during outdoor recreation, if they can keep six feet apart. 

  

 

Disobeying California’s mandate could result in a misdemeanor and a fine, among other penalties, according to the California Department of Public Health. However, counties with their own mask mandates have learned that enforcement is challenging, and some have leaned toward “education” instead of penalties. 

 

Prior to the state’s rule, most Bay Area counties already had their own requirements. So did Los Angeles and San Diego. Some counties, including Riverside and San Bernardino, had temporary orders that were later lifted.  

 

Meanwhile, many other counties stuck to a “strongly encourage” approach.  

 

et even with the new statewide order, there is almost certain to be continued public resistance and polarization. Across the state and country, arguments over masks have prompted brawls, threats and other violent acts. In one extreme case, a security guard at a Michigan Dollar Store was shot and killed after a dispute with a customer who refused to wear one. But why? 

 

Psychologists and public health experts point to a variety of reasons: Some people don’t like being told what to do, while some are skeptical about the science or confused by the mixed messaging. 

 

For others,  masks have become political. 

 

Recently, Orange County became a battleground for face mask policy. This month, Dr. Nichole Quick resigned as the county health officer after receiving threats by people who opposed her mask mandate. Residents in opposition argued that the mask order was infringing on their rights to choose, while others said they weren’t persuaded by the science. 

 

Two days after Quick’s resignation, the county’s new acting health officer changed the county’s mask guidelines from “must” to “should.”  

 

 

 

 

By Erica Hellerstein, The Mercury News

Community health clinics that serve some of the region’s most vulnerable residents are struggling with how to keep their doors open while patient visits plummet during the coronavirus shelter-in-place mandate.

Statewide, patient visits are down by roughly half across California’s network of community clinics and health centers, leading to tens of millions in lost revenue each week.

Many local health clinics that primarily serve low-income residents and rely on Medicaid reimbursements to make up a large portion of their income. So the dramatic reductions in patient visits threaten their ability to stay open and care for the kinds of patients who are at a heightened risk of contracting the virus.

Experts say the Bay Area, which has been in lockdown longer than anywhere else in the nation, has been particularly affected, with some already instituting furloughs or layoffs.

“The Bay Area clinics are hard-hit,’ says Carmela Castellano-Garcia, president and chief executive officer of the California Primary Care Association.

There are about 1,300 community clinics and health centers (CCHCs) across California serving more than 7 million patients annually — nearly one-sixth of the state’s population. Many provide care to residents particularly at-risk of contracting the virus or uniquely vulnerable to it. Community health centers serve roughly 1 in every 3 MediCal recipients, and in 2019 worked with 486,628 migrant workers and 246,268 homeless residents, according to CPCA.

With patient visits down, Castellano-Garcia says California’s community clinics are collectively losing about $90 million a week. Up to 77 health centers statewide may not be able to make payroll within 90 days if the current trends persist.

“It is not sustainable,” she says.

In the South Bay, patient visits at Gardner Health Services, which works in Santa Clara and San Mateo Counties, have dropped nearly 60%, says Chief Operating Officer Efrain Coria, prompting financial losses of about $1 million a month. Gardner has reduced its workforce by about 22%, Coria says, and laid off 135 staff members, though he emphasizes he hopes to re-hire many of them in the coming months when and if things calm down.

In the East Bay, La Clínica de La Raza, which serves about 90,000 patients annually in clinics throughout Contra Costa, Alameda and Solano Counties, has seen in-person visits drop about 30% since the start of the pandemic, says chief executive officer Jane Garcia, resulting in financial losses of about $3 million over the past month. About 300 employees have been furloughed.

However, La Clinica’s health centers have seen some gains since the state eased some restrictions for telehealth services, allowing patients to connect with health providers electronically. Those visits are also billable to Medicaid.

“If that option had not been authorized, it would have shut us down,” Garcia says. “And you would have seen [our patients] in emergency rooms and hospitals, or they wouldn’t have gone in at all.”

Marc Gannon, chief operating officer of Fremont’s Tri-City Health Center, which serves about 26,000 patients in Fremont, Hayward, Union City, Newark, and San Leandro — 37 % of whom are on MediCal or uninsured and the majority of whom live below 200% of the federal poverty level — says the organization changed its business model “essentially overnight” from in-person visits to telehealth appointments.

But the clinic is still suffering declines in revenue. In-patient visits have decreased by about 35% since the start of the pandemic and Gannon says they are considering reducing staffing to manage the financial hit.

“This is financially a very difficult time, there is no way of sugarcoating this,” says Gannon. “We are analyzing sustainability on a day to day basis.”

Amid the financial challenges, Tri-City health care workers are still trying to check in with patients by phone, providing resources from MediCal and other safety net services that they may be eligible for or with behavioral health services for people struggling with isolation and loneliness due to shelter-in-place orders. Last week, they reached 3,000 of the network’s 26,000 patients.

The federal government recently granted the nation’s federally funded community health centers a reprieve, awarding $1.32 billion to health centers nationwide. But many say that’s not enough to cover their losses. The $1.3 million the South Bay’s Gardner Health Services expects to receive, which is supposed to cover a 12-month period, would last between five and six weeks, Coria says.

Still, Bay Area community health centers want to make sure that people know their doors — virtually and physically — are still open to people who need care.

“Community health centers are adaptive, resilient, and have been around for a very long time,” says Gannon. “We are going to survive this.”

Erica Hellerstein is a journalist with the Mercury News. This article is part of The California Divide, a collaboration among newsrooms examining income inequity and economic survival in California.

ByBen Christopher, CalMatters

This coming November, every one of California’s more than 20 million registered voters may receive a ballot in the mail — whether they ask for one or not. In fact, many election administrators and advocates say it’s inevitable.

“It’s not a question of ‘if,’ said Kim Alexander, the president of the California Voter Foundation. “But ‘how.’”

California is already ahead of the curve when it comes to voting from home. In the March primary election, 75% of voters got a ballot in their mailbox. But the exigencies of social distancing are putting pressure on state lawmakers to round that up to 100%, ensuring that every registered voter has the option to cast a ballot without having to physically crowd into a polling place.    

A bill from Palo Alto Democratic Assemblyman Marc Berman would ensure just that. But with most state legislators sheltering in place until at least early May, all eyes are on the governor who, with an executive order, could make the upcoming election an all-mail affair. 

Earlier this month, Joe Holland, president of the California Association of Clerks and Election Officials and top election official in Santa Barbara County, sent Gov. Gavin Newsom a letter requesting that he ink a new edict, declaring the November contest an “all-mail ballot election.” 

Even if mass gatherings are permitted in November — something Newsom says is unlikely — county election officials say time is of the essence. Ballots have to be ordered, voter rolls assembled, polling places secured. 

“The consensus for November 2020 is that California is going to go all vote-by-mail — and we should. We don’t want to have a Wisconsin debacle,” Holland said, referring to the April 7 presidential primary where some voters reported waiting in line for five hours. Since then at least three dozen voters and polling workers in Wisconsin have tested positive for COVID-19.

(Image: Sean Freese / Flickr)

The governor’s press office has not responded to a request for comment about prospects for a California all vote-by-mail election. 

Even an “all-mail” election in California isn’t quite what it sounds like — it wouldn’t really be without a brick-and-mortar option. For those who need some extra help exercising their right to vote, state law requires counties to set up a certain number of in-person polling places.

Through Holland, the association also asked Newsom to grant them the authority to radically scale back that requirement. And therein lies the current rub.

Some advocates warn that an insufficient number of drop-off sites and vote centers could leave many voters — particularly those from underrepresented demographic groups — either unable to vote or stuck in long lines at the few remaining in-person locations.

“Waiving the state’s in-person voting standards will potentially disenfranchise tens, if not hundreds, of thousands of California voters,” union president Bob Schoonover, whose chapter of the Service Employees International Union represents tens of thousands of public sector workers across Southern California, wrote in a letter to Secretary of State Alex Padilla earlier this month.

Like so many debates of the COVID-era, it’s a disagreement that pits constitutional rights once thought to be non-negotiable against the prescriptions of public health. 

“We’re trying to find the right balance of response that gives voters as much choice as possible, but also keeps them safe, and frankly, which is also implementable in the short number of months that the counties have to gear up,” said California Common Cause interim director Kathay Feng.

The coronavirus pandemic has injected new urgency into the national conversation about voting by mail, with some states now making it easier for voters to cast their ballots while self-isolating at home — and others not, and getting sued for it. 

Despite evidence that making it easier to vote remotely does not benefit one party over another, the debate has taken on a partisan bent. 

Weighing in earlier this month, President Trump urged Republicans to fight “very hard” against the expansion of vote-by-mail opportunities, claiming without evidence that such a system has “tremendous potential for voter fraud” and that “for whatever reason” such systems don’t “work out well for Republicans.” 

The president’s views notwithstanding, recent polling has found strong majorities of Americans believe voters ought to be able to cast their ballots by mail without an excuse — though results are split on whether a majority of Republicans feel the same way. 

But in California, there is little debate in policy-making circles about the merits of vote-by-mail elections.

Throughout April, Secretary of State Padilla — the administrator in chief of the state election system and, like Gov. Newsom, a Democrat — convened roughly 80 election officials, experts and advocates. They met, remotely, of course, in daily conference calls to game out how California might hold a statewide election during a full-blown pandemic.

Subgroups splintered off to hammer out every last logistical detail. Would registration deadlines be changed? How will each voter’s language preference be determined? Self-adhering envelopes that risk gumming up ballot-counting machines versus those sealed by pathogen-packed spit — how should counties decide?

Jonathan Stein, a program manager for the Asian Law Caucus’ voting rights program, was part of that task force. He said there was unanimity on at least one issue.

“There seemed to be almost universal agreement that we need to send every single voter a vote-by-mail ballot,” he said.

The question is, what other options will be available too?

Election rights advocates say in-person polling places offer a vital service to voters who don’t speak English, who experience some kind of disability, who don’t have a fixed address, who recently moved or who simply don’t feel comfortable with or do not understand the vote-by-mail process. 

“There are a lot of communities that depend on polling places and polling centers,” said Mike Young, political director at the California League of Conservation Voters. In California, in-person voters skew poorer, younger and less white than the average voter. 

An insufficient number of polling places could jeopardize public health even further, Young added. Like Holland, he pointed to Wisconsin as a cautionary tale. “People are anticipating that this is going to be an insanely high-turnout election.”

California voting rights advocates seem to have at least the tacit support of the state’s top election official.

“I think people who need or prefer an in-person option deserve it,” Padilla told KQED earlier this month. “And so we’re going to have to work really hard with counties to ensure we maintain as much in-person voting as we can.”

But county registrars argue that such requirements may put voters and poll workers at unnecessary risk. 

“Quite frankly if we had an election tomorrow I wouldn’t be within a hundred feet of a polling place,” said Holland in Santa Barbara.

There are also practical questions about space and staffing, both of which are severely limited by the pandemic. Polling places are often hosted in schools, senior centers, and the garages of private homes —  most of which are likely off the table now. The typical poll worker is a retiree, a cohort particularly at risk of severe COVID-19 complications. 

Santa Barbara County is preparing to reduce the number of in-person locations from the 86 that were open in March to around five. Holland’s office may use the registrar’s three offices and then try to secure a handful of additional sites and the necessary poll workers.

“I don’t know if I can find three other facilities,” he said. “I have 15 staff and that’s when they’re here and healthy and right now three or four are out sick.”

Assemblyman Berman’s bill said his bill does not yet address in-person polling site requirements, but that the “first move shouldn’t be to weaken existing in-person voting requirements.” He urged state and county officials to be “creative” in finding locations and staff. 

In the meantime, he said, some additional guidance from the governor could be helpful.

Newsom has already issued an executive order mandating that all voters in two upcoming special elections receive ballots in the mail. Though the order “encouraged” counties “to make in-person voting opportunities available,” they were given the freedom to do so “in a manner consistent with public health and safety.”

The two elections, a Senate race in Riverside County and a congressional contest north of Los Angeles, is showcasing how counties may differ in how they administer elections during a pandemic. In the congressional race, split between Los Angeles and Ventura counties, there will be at least a dozen locations where voters can drop off ballots in-person. 

In Riverside County, home to the special Senate district, there will be only two physical drop-off points and no polling places or vote centers where voters can have their questions answered or their errors corrected. 

“That’s a perfect illustration of what will happen if we give election officials full discretion,” said Stein.

CalMatters.org is a nonprofit, nonpartisan media venture explaining California policies and politics.

ByElizabeth Aguilera, CalMatters

More than a month since officials closed schools due to the COVID-19 pandemic, California officials said a two-week blitz led by First Partner Jennifer Siebel Newsom has brought in 70,000 computers and other devices that will be distributed to needy students this week.

Gov. Gavin Newsom has stressed the importance of distance learning and education multiple times during the past month — even talking about helping his own children with school work. Monday he focused attention on his administration’s efforts to secure donations from tech giants such as Google and Apple, garnering tens of thousands of computers and internet connections to children in need.

“For class to be in session, it is imperative that California addresses the inequities in access to computers, technology tools and connectivity to ensure that online learning can in fact reach all of California’s children,” Newsom said. 

In addition, in Sacramento, the city is converting seven transit buses into super hotspots. Google is to begin establishing the first of 100,000 previously pledged hotspots during the first week of May. Already, Apple has distributed 10,000 IPads to 800 school districts and Google has given out 4,000 laptops.

Yet, even with all of  the new devices going out in the coming weeks, it’s unclear if all of these efforts will really make a dent in the gap — highlighted by the pandemic — between those who have digital access and those who do not. 

Siebel Newsom said one in five California children does not have connectivity or a device to access remote learning. Based on 2018-19 enrollment data, that means roughly 1.2 million children in California lack access. 

“We all know that education is fundamental to opportunity and our mission will not end until every child has what they need to continue learning,” she said.

Previously, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Tony Thurmond said that the state is trying to get 150,000 devices in the hands of students who don’t have one.

This is especially critical for low-income students and students of color, Siebel Newsom said, referring to a recent study that showed 50% of low-income parents and 42% of parents of color “are worried about distance learning because they don’t have a personal device at home.”

Newsom also indicated the state will spend $30 million to connect more households that need it.  Most of those funds, $25 million, will come from the California Teleconnect Fund and will be prioritized for rural, small and medium-sized districts.  

The state Public Utilities Commission will also prioritize $5 million of the $30 million for computers for low-income communities.

The state Transportation Agency is teaming up with the city of Sacramento to convert the seven city buses into rolling super hotspots and get them going by May 1. These buses will provide connectivity within at least a 500-foot radius. Locations for the buses haven’t been announced. This is a pilot program that may be rolled out in other cities if it proves successful, according to Newsom’s office.

Since California began to track cases of coronavirus in the state, there have been 1,208 deaths, including 42 over the past weekend. Newsom said he will reveal a more detailed plan for opening up the state on Wednesday. 

“We are not seeing the downward trend we need to see to provide more clarity on the roadmap to recovery,” he said.

CalMatters.org is a nonprofit, nonpartisan media venture explaining California policies and politics.

By Jacqueline García, La Opinión

Families with children who qualify for free or reduced-price meals at their schools — regardless of immigration status — may notice something in the mail to help them buy groceries. 

California is issuing one-time food stamps with credits of up to $365 per child to help qualifying families get through the coronavirus outbreak. The Pandemic-Electronic Benefit Transfer card, or P-EBT, from the Department of Social Services is an emergency disaster benefit that can be used to buy food and groceries, including online at Walmart and Amazon.

The first cards arrived last week for families receiving CalFresh, Medi-Cal or foster care benefits as a supplement to their EBT card. The second phase, which starts Friday, requires low-income families to apply at https://ca.p-ebt.org/.

(Image: California is sending pandemic food cards to qualifying students. In this file photo, Antionette Martinez and her son Caden, 5, who receive CalFresh, do their weekly grocery shop at FoodMaxx on July 26, 2019. Photo by Anne Wernikoff for CalMatters)

The deadline to apply is June 30.

The timing of this extra boost comes as many families struggle to provide nutritious meals for their children while schools are closed in response to the novel coronavirus.

Betzabe Castillo, who has a 9-year-old son at a public school in Stockton, California, was among the first to receive the P-EBT cards. She welcomes the help since her husband is the only one bringing in an income. Their rent is nearly $2,000 a month.

“It is very difficult because rent does not wait, the bills do not either,” Castillo said. “We are surviving day to day.”

Berenice Burgos, who has two children, ages 9 and 4, also received a P-EBT card last week. She wasn’t aware of the extra help but was grateful when it arrived in the mail.

“Right now I am not working and my husband, who is a mechanic, got his hours cut,” said Burgos, who lives in Concord, in Northern California. “It is very good help, especially for my children – to buy their milk, cereal and fruit because they want to eat all day.”

Much needed help while schools are closed

Jason Montiel, a spokesman for the social services department, said the state is offering additional assistance to children who are eligible for free or reduced price meals while school is closed.

The cards are distributed in two phases. The first batch of about 2 million went to families who enrolled in CalFresh, Medi-Cal, or foster care.

“For this phase, the beneficiaries do not have to do anything and the card will be mailed to them,” Montiel said.

The second phase requires residents to apply. The state projects an additional 1.8 million more children are eligible. 

State officials say the card is available to eligible families regardless of a student’s immigration status or their parents’ status. It also doesn’t impact whether children are picking up grab-and-go meals from schools.

The food card isn’t considered a public charge by the Department of Homeland Security. However, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services may consider several factors under its public charge test. Those who have questions should seek legal advice.

State officials also want recipients to be on alert for scams. Since the P-EBT cards began arriving in the mail, some recipients have received calls from people posing as social service representatives seeking personal information.

“The Department of Social Services will not contact clients or ask for personal information,” said Montiel. “We will not request a Social Security Number or any document that is shared with us.”

How do I learn more?

For more information about the P-EBT card visit:

https://ca.p-ebt.org/en/info 

Those interested should apply between May 22 and June 30: 

https://ca.p-ebt.org/

If you have questions regarding public charge, visit: https://covid19.ca.gov/img/wp/listos_covid_19_immigrant_guidance_en_daf.pdf

Jacqueline García is a reporter with La Opinión. This article is part of  The California Divide, a collaboration among newsrooms examining income inequity and economic survival in California.

ByBarbara Feder Ostrov, CalMatters

Every day, while we’re all stuck at home, politicians and health officials and news anchors point to graphics showing the latest statistics on the coronavirus pandemic to indicate what might happen next, in your region and around the world. 

Underlying those visuals are disease forecasting models — complex mathematical algorithms that predict disease spread and severity based on different scenarios. Because they can help predict the effects of different interventions, including our social distancing, coronavirus pandemic models significantly influence how governments are responding. 

It’s tempting to regard these models as oracles that can tell us precisely what to do and when to do it. Can they tell us when we should return to work, or when our kids can go back to school? Is Grandma safe in her nursing home or should she come home? When can businesses safely reopen?

As California’s COVID-19 caseload tops 30,000, state officials are using a model developed at Johns Hopkins University to aid in their planning. If you’ve watched Gov. Gavin Newsom’s daily briefings online, some of the charts shown are based on the model’s predictions.

But the models need to be fed reliable data, and some data is in short supply, especially without widespread U.S. testing for the novel coronavirus that causes COVID-19. We still don’t know how many people have been infected without symptoms, for example. Other inputs, such as incubation periods and death rates, change by the day as we learn more about this virus. 

“What makes modeling especially challenging are the human factors. Individual behaviors, health care infrastructure and political response each can affect the outcome of an epidemic,” said Shweta Bansal, an associate professor of biology at Georgetown University who specializes in disease modeling. “I think of models as a call to action. They can tell us what happens if we don’t act and how we can prevent the most dire consequences.” 

Here are five things you should know to make sense of infectious disease models:

Why are there so many COVID pandemic models — and why are they all so different? 

There are different types of infectious disease models for different purposes. Each has limitations and each can be useful in its own way.

 “SEIR” models, for example, involve equations based on the number of susceptible people (S) who can be infected, the number of people exposed (E), the number of people infected (I) and the number of people recovered(R). Agent-based models use massive computer power to simulate the actions of millions of hypothetical people to predict the spread of disease. Still other models examine a disease outbreak in one country and try to predict outcomes elsewhere in the world based on that data. Some models look at travel patterns in spreading disease, and still others assess how age, ethnicity and contributing illnesses may affect survival rates. 

Epidemiologists say it helps to have more than one model in responding to disease outbreaks because they use different inputs. Combining results from multiple models can give a more nuanced picture of an outbreak’s trajectory. 

“The fact that there are so many models is a healthy sign,” said Bansal. “It’s the same with weather forecasts that rely on multiple mathematical models. But unlike a weather forecast, with a disease forecast we have the ability to change the outcome.”

The White House has controversially used a model developed by the University of Washington’s Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, which some disease experts have criticized as being based on overly optimistic assumptions about the benefits of social distancing, among other statistical issues. The Imperial College London model, which predicted as many as 22 million U.S. deaths if no action was taken, also apparently prompted the Trump administration to issue tougher new social distancing guidelines. 

  
What goes into making an epidemiological model for an infectious respiratory disease? 

California and some other states use an SEIR model developed by Johns Hopkins University epidemiologist Dr. Justin Lessler. This coronavirus pandemic model, according to the California Department of Public Health, takes into account assumptions about how long the disease takes to incubate, how long people are infectious, how many people each patient can infect, the fatality rate, how many people need hospitalization or intensive care, and importantly for hospital planning, how many people need ventilators because they can’t breathe on their own. 

The model assumes that NPIs – “non-pharmaceutical interventions” such as social distancing – started in the state March 20. In fact, some counties ordered residents to shelter in place earlier, some later.

California also has been faring better on a daily basis than this model’s predictions had forecasted — only 4,892 cases were reported on April 16, compared to 12,119 cases projected for that date. Assembly members set aside time at a budget hearing Monday to question the Newsom administration about the model and seek more details about its assumptions.

Rodger Butler, a spokesman for the California Health and Human Services Agency, cautioned that “there is considerable uncertainty” in the model’s predictions because we still don’t know enough about how the virus behaves and, without widespread testing, how many people are infected. “We are continuously refining our model with researchers and local public health offices,” Butler said. 

Which raises the next question:

What happens if you don’t have enough data, or the right data? 

This is what keeps public health experts up at night. 

Because testing has lagged so badly in the United States, “right now we don’t know how many people are infected,” said Karin Michels, professor and chair of the epidemiology department at UCLA’s School of Public Health. “The biggest unknown (for disease models) is the denominator. How many people out of the infected are actually dying or wind up in the ICU? We have no idea at this point.” 

Epidemiologists want to know more about when people are no longer infectious. They hope to learn more about who, once infected, is most likely to need hospitalization or a ventilator, to prevent overwhelming hospitals. True fatality rates aren’t one-size-fits-all; they will differ by age, gender, underlying illness and access to health care, among other factors. 

Epidemiologists also need to better understand how many people might have been infected but not show symptoms. New antibody tests now being rolled out can help answer that question, but not quickly, and some of these tests are proving inaccurate. Some public health experts say that preventable delays in widespread testing and a perceived chaotic federal response have prevented the kind of critical data gathering needed to get a handle on outbreaks in various regions of the country — and to provide the kind of intelligence needed before reopening the country.

What makes a model succeed in its predictions?

Disease modelers and mathematicians argue about this a lot. The quality of the data that goes into a disease model is important. The range of error in the model’s predictions are important, too. If early predictions of a model don’t measure up to reality, its later predictions may not as well.

The University of Washington’s coronavirus pandemic model, for example, which aimed to predict outbreaks based primarily on early data from China and later Europe, has had such a wide range of error in its predicted death rates that some epidemiologists have recommended that governments do not use it for planning. The model’s predictions of when cases will peak in various regions also have swung dramatically in different weeks — and rarely coincided with other models’ forecasts, prompting some experts’ concern about the model’s validity going forward. Some politicians are citing the model’s relatively optimistic forecasts as justification to open the country earlier than public health officials recommend.

The model’s developers say they are continually updating their model and have adjusted it to reflect regional differences in how daily death rates peak over time, and how social distancing policies vary by region.

Still, disease models are supposed to serve as a wake-up call prompting us to act. If our actions succeed in slowing infections and deaths, making the predictions inaccurate — that’s a good thing. 

What do public health experts wish people understood about coronavirus pandemic models?

Disease models are not perfect, and they can adapt as new data becomes available. Models “can help us think through different scenarios, but they shouldn’t be used as crystal balls,” Bansal said. “If we believe that a model’s prediction of 100,000 deaths is what will happen if we don’t act, then we do everything we can to prevent those 100,000 deaths.”

Also: they’re better for predicting short-term needs and outcomes, Michels said, such as how many ventilators a hospital might need next month, rather than next year: 

“I don’t think we can predict the fall yet. We only know the virus will still be around, so life will be complicated.”

CalMatters.org is a nonprofit, nonpartisan media venture explaining California policies and politics.

ByFelicia Mello, CalMatters

Nikolas Schumann was a community college student and budding painter when he first learned about the San Francisco Art Institute from a mentor. He visited the school, “absolutely loved” it, and decided to transfer there in 2018 after a large scholarship knocked his tuition from $46,000 per year down to $15,000. 

“It just had so much history and was so diverse,” Schumann said. “They birth interesting and wild artists.”

But just a few months from graduation, Schumann’s plans are in limbo after the art institute, along with another Bay Area college, Notre Dame de Namur University, said last month they would not be enrolling any new students in the fall.  Art institute officials cited the coronavirus outbreak as a factor in their decision.

The news from the two schools — one a Catholic university that was the first in California to admit women in 1868, the other a fine arts academy that counts photographer Annie Leibovitz among its alumni — highlights the financial challenges facing the state’s small private colleges as the pandemic imposes new costs and throws the admissions cycle into turmoil.

(Image: Painting major Nikolas Schumann picks up a canvas from the closed Chestnut Street campus of San Francisco Art Institute. Schumann says he will likely transfer to California College of the Arts next year to finish his degree. Photo by Anne Wernikoff for CalMatters)

Unlike public universities like the University of California system, private colleges cannot count on state tax dollars to keep them afloat. Many of their most attractive selling points, from charming campuses to face time with professors, no longer apply in a world where instruction has moved online. With families less willing and able to pay tuition that can reach $50,000 per year for what some have dubbed ‘Zoom University,’ the pandemic has raised fears that a growing number of independent colleges could scale back, merge or even shut down.

“Most schools do not have large endowments that could provide the rainy day fund that we need right now,” said Kristen Soares, executive director of the Association of Independent California Colleges and Universities, which represents private, non-profit colleges. “If this goes into the fall, it could be very devastating.”

Most at risk, experts say: less-selective residential colleges that are not well-known outside their local area. The Midwest and Northeast have seen a wave of closures among such schools. California, with its larger population of college-ready high school graduates, hasn’t yet — but the pandemic could change that. 

The American Council on Education, a national association of colleges and universities, projects that enrollment will drop by 15 percent nationwide next year. Colleges have been refunding room and board charges after sending students home, and canceling commencements and other revenue-generating events.

Those costs are easier to weather for a university like Stanford, with its nearly $28 billion endowment, but could pose an existential crisis for a less-wealthy school, said Douglas Webber, a higher education economist at Temple University.

Think of it as comparing a corporate fast-food chain to a mom-and-pop restaurant, Webber said. “The giant chain is going to be able to find ways to cut back,” he said. “The small family restaurant, with the same percentage hit, it’s going to put them under.”

Nationally, he said, “I would be shocked if there aren’t a lot of closures within the next 12 months.”

Not just bastions of the elite, California’s private, non-profit colleges — which have a median endowment of just over $24 million — award about a fifth of the state’s bachelor’s degrees. About half of their students are the first in their families to attend college, often relying heavily on scholarships and loans to enroll. 

When the Association of Independent California Colleges and Universities surveyed its members about the costs of the pandemic, 25 of 85 colleges responded, reporting collective losses of $150 million for the spring semester, Soares said. California’s independent colleges will receive $156 million in total from the federal stimulus bill called the CARES Act, with half the money directed to students as emergency aid and the remainder distributed in various amounts to the colleges. The organization still is tallying losses among independent colleges, Soares said, and has asked state lawmakers to ensure that federal relief money is available to private as well as public schools.

Many colleges have frozen hiring, including Mills College in Oakland, which took “a seven-figure hit” to revenue this year, according to its president, Beth Hillman. The 1,100-student liberal arts college for women and non-binary students has so far managed to avoid layoffs, she said, in part by shifting employees into other roles, like turning athletic coaches into counselors. 

(Image: San Francisco Art Institute, founded in 1871, is no longer enrolling new students due to financial pressures in part related to the novel coronavirus pandemic. Photo by Anne Wernikoff for CalMatters)

Mills already had taken steps in recent years to shore up its future. It slashed tuition, worked to attract more transfer students from community colleges, and filled empty dorm spaces with students from nearby, overcrowded UC Berkeley.

While she wasn’t worried about closing, Hillman said she expected the financial pain to worsen in the fall. “There are so many unknowns,” she said. “I don’t know how anybody could be unconcerned at this point.”

Liberal arts colleges often have less experience delivering classes online than large public universities. They are struggling to maintain a sense of community among far-flung students and faculty.  

“For our undergraduates, we are a medium-sized liberal arts school focused on transforming students’ lives, so the transition online is challenging to our very purpose,” said Phil Phillips, the chief operating officer at Pepperdine University. “We always say that what goes on outside the classroom is super-important.”

To keep in touch, the Christian university has held Zoom chapel services in which students and faculty share, sometimes tearfully, about challenges like trying to teach online while caring for three small children, Phillips said. 

Private colleges could also suffer if economic fallout from the pandemic prompts students to choose schools that are less expensive or closer to home, as some national surveys have found. 

Michelle Myers, a college admissions consultant in the Bay Area, said she typically doesn’t hear much from her clients after they receive their admissions offers. But this spring, she has met with almost every high school senior on her list as they reassess their options. Many, she said, are considering taking time off or attending community college in the fall rather than going directly to a four-year school.

“Whether you’re paying for private or in-state public (college), it’s like, ‘Am I really paying this for online classes?’ ” she said. “If it’s a good fit and they really want to go to that school, most of them are thinking, ‘I’m going to try to defer.’ ”

Vince Cuseo, the dean of admission at Occidental College, said he’s also seen an unusually high number of requests to defer admission from students uncertain about the future.

Students are thinking, “’I’ve applied to these institutions and need to plop my money down, (but) I don’t have a sense of what that experience is going to be like in the fall,” Cuseo said.

Adding to the uncertainty is a rule change made last year by the National Association for College Admission Counseling that will allow colleges to continue recruiting students even after they’ve committed to other schools. That means even colleges with May 1 deadlines for students to send in deposits may not know by then what their fall classes will look like. Others are pushing back deadlines in response to the coronavirus.

“It’s one thing to gauge how many students made a commitment to a college in mid-April; it’s another thing to know how many will show up, if they can, in August for orientation,” said Cuseo.

On the plus side, the small size of some private colleges can make it easier for them to react to challenges quickly, Cuseo said. Since prospective students can’t visit campus, Occidental has given them access to videos from online classes being taught this semester and set up virtual panel discussions with current students involved in specific interests like student government and pre-health majors. 

The University of the Pacific has made its financial aid packages more attractive with a $1,500-per-year grant for expenses due to the coronavirus, available to new and current students. 

And small colleges argue that their low student-to-faculty ratio means more personalized attention, even online. 

“When you have a professor with experience in the field who can schedule one-on-one meetings with students regularly, that’s much different than an 1,100-person class where faculty relies on teaching assistants and graduate students to try to have personal connections,” Hillman said.

Colleges that likely have the most to fear from the coronavirus are those that already faced declining enrollment and rising debt before the outbreak — as was the case with San Francisco Art Institute and Notre Dame de Namur.

(Image: The back window of an art studio seen from the street at the San Francisco Art Institute. Photo by Anne Wernikoff for CalMatters)

“COVID accelerated the downward spiral,” San Francisco Art Institute Board Chair Pam Rorke Levy told alumni in a conference call April 20, after the college said it would help students transfer to other schools while it tried to come up with a new business plan. 

The college had been discussing possible mergers with three other colleges, including the University of San Francisco, Rorke Levy said. But those negotiations “came to a grinding stop… the minute the shelter-in-place orders happened,” she said.

That left people like Nikolas Schumann, the art student, in a bind. He’s now trying to figure out which schools will accept his credits so he can transfer. The art institute has said it will continue instruction over the summer so students in their final year can graduate — but Schumann worries the plan, like so many others before, will fall through.

“It sucks when you’ve found the school you think is the one for you,” he said, “and it just shuts down.”

CalMatters.org is a nonprofit, nonpartisan media venture explaining California policies and politics.

On Friday, Representative Jared Huffman and his Democratic colleagues in the House of Representatives passed a three-trillion-dollar package to ramp up the federal government’s response to the pandemic.

Huffman and the Democrats are also trying to bring the House together, remotely, in order to get back to work. News Director Steve Mencher spoke with Huffman about the details.

 

 

(Image: Representative Jared Huffman at a Town Hall in Petaluma in 2017. Credit: Wikimedia Commons.)

To hear more of their conversation, watch our coronavirus Town Hall norcalpublicmedia.org/coroanvirus. 

 

 

We provide daily coronavirus updates on KRCB radio 91. Tune in at 9 a.m. and 6:44 p.m. for the latest local news. Here's our update for Monday, May 18.

Demographic data released last week shows Sonoma County’s Latino residents are 4.5 times more likely to contract the coronavirus than white residents. KRCB’s Adia White spoke with Alegría De La Cruz, chief deputy Sonoma County counsel, about some of the steps the county is taking to address this disparity. Listen here:

To hear more of their conversation, watch our coronavirus Town Hall tomorrow night at 7 p.m. on KRCB TV 22. Submit your questions at norcalpublicmedia.org/coroanvirus. 

We provide daily coronavirus updates on KRCB radio 91. Tune in at 9 a.m. and 6:44 p.m. for the latest local news. Here's our update for Monday, May 4.

Sonoma County Supervisor Susan Gorin will join us for Tuesday's virtual town hall at 7 p.m. In our interview, Gorin answers two listener questions — one with concerns about the upcoming fire season, and one with a personal question about whether it's safe to go back to work.

Listen to her responses here:

Gorin says new COVID testing sites will be available this week in Santa Rosa and Petaluma. You can visit LHI.care/covidtesting to register for a test or call 888-634-1123 to schedule an appointment. Testing is available for everyone, with or without symptoms. Health care workers can still call (707) 565-4667 to schedule a test.

 

 

By Julie Appleby, Kaiser Health News May 8, 2020

Santa Clara County says sheltering in place appears to be “flattening the curve” — or slowing the rate of coronavirus infection in the county. 

“However, the number of infections is still rising, and we have not yet reached the peak,” says Antoinnae Comeaux, CBO of the county Emergency Operations Center, in a note to community partners. “Our collective efforts are giving health officials more time to plan for a surge in patients and minimize the number of deaths in our County.”

The Public Health Department has expanded its COVID-19 data dashboard to include confirmed cases and deaths by city of residence and deaths by race/ethnicity. Though the county notes that community transmission is believed to be widespread, and case counts represent only a small portion of cases within each city due to limited testing capacity. 

Ahead of the Easter holiday, Comeaux asked faith leaders to help keep their communities safe and healthy by reminding congregations about the importance of social distancing.

“In the spirit of the love we have for one another, it is absolutely necessary to keep our distance and stay at home with only the people we live with during this season of religious celebration,” she said.

Comeaux also offered a reminder that disclosures of large inventories of personal protective equipment (PPE) and ventilators by individuals and entities are due to the county, per a public health order, by April 15.

More information can be found on the County Public Health website. Any business, faith, nonprofit, or community leader with questions should contact This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it..

The Santa Rosa CityBus will further reduce its service this week to help slow the spread of coronavirus. 

Starting Monday, April 13, the bus will operate on a Sunday schedule seven days a week for essential travel only. Sunday routes run from about 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. 

The only exception will be additional service on Route 1 and Route 2Bto allow for social distancing and reduce overcrowding. Service on Route 10 will be on weekday routing (service to Round Barn) with a weekend timetable.

(Image: Wikipedia Creative Commons)

CityBus will also be providing a special call-ahead service for essential travel Monday through Saturday between 6 a.m. and 10 a.m., and 5 p.m. and 8 p.m. This service will be provided by the City’s paratransit contractor, MV Transportation, but is open to the general public with the following guidelines:

1. This service is for riders who MUST travel to either a job at an essential service provider or to an essential destination within the city of Santa Rosa.
2. Riders must call ahead to 707-546-1999 to register for this service and schedule this trip.
3. Riders registering for this service will need to provide their name, home address, contact information and destination address trip. Once registered for the service, riders can schedule a trip up to seven days in advance of the trip but at a minimum must schedule their trip the day before between the hours of 8 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday-Saturday, or between the hours of 9 a.m. and 3 p.m. on Sundays.
4. Riders must call to cancel trips at least two hours in advance in order to continue receiving this service.
5. Language assistance is available to any non-English speakers who wish to schedule trips.
6. Due to limited capacity, trips may be prioritized or further limited in the future.

Santa Rosa Paratransit will continue to operate regular weekday, Saturday and Sunday service hours for essential travel. And Route 16 (Oakmont) will continue to operate for essential travel.

Find more details here.

Santa Rosa will soon be making use of a city-owned parking lot to house people experiencing homelessness in tents.

The goal is to provide a space where people living without shelter can maintain safe social distance amid the coronavirus pandemic.

The parking lot at Finley Community Center will include up to 70 tents, spaced 12 feet apart, with each tent accommodating an individual or couple. 

The tents will be provided by the city, and portable toilets, hand-washing stations, meal delivery, on-site management and services will be coordinated by Catholic Charities staff. Overnight on-site security will also be provided.

“We are moving forward with this emergency temporary measure given the urgent need to protect the City’s unsheltered homeless community as they are some of the most vulnerable to the spread of the coronavirus,” Mayor Tom Schwedhelm said in a press release. “This new, managed site offers a safer, temporary option for those who have been living outdoors in situations where social distancing is challenging if not impossible.”

Setup of the site is anticipated to begin the week of May 11, with occupancy likely beginning the week of May 18 and lasting through the duration of the county’s shelter-in-place order.

The 24,600-square-foot parking lot is located between the Person Senior Wing building and the Finley tennis courts. 

More information about homeless support during the COVID-19 pandemic can be found at https://srcity.org/3284/Homelessness-Services.

ByBen Christopher, CalMatters

For all the talk of ventilators and new-fangled serological tests, it’s the shortage of glorified Q-tips that has brought California, the world’s fifth largest economy, to its knees. But that may be about to change.

Fresh off a phone call with President Trump, Gov. Gavin Newsom said Wednesday that the Trump administration would be sending hundreds of thousands of nasopharyngeal swabs to California in the coming weeks — providing enough to alleviate a statewide shortage of a primitive but essential coronavirus testing tool.

“We will receive just this week a minimum of 100,000 swabs. That’s the ability to collect 100,000 specimen samples,” Newsom said, adding that the feds have promised to ship a quarter-million next week and more than that in the weeks to come. “That will go a long way to give us all more confidence that we can meet some of these testing goals.”

The governor and public health experts have identified a lack of testing as one of the chief impediments to relaxing society-wide shelter-in-place orders and “reopening” the economy.  Wednesday the governor also announced a goal of opening between 80 and 100 new test sites around the state before the end of the month.

(Image: Gov. Gavin Newsom said Saturday his goal is for California to acquire 10,000 ventilators. File photo by Anne Wernikoff for CalMatters)

“Testing testing testing,” Maura Calsyn, health policy director at the Center for American Progress, a center-left think tank in Washington D.C., said in a phone call last week. “In order to ‘reopen’ you have to have evidence that the rate of infection is low enough that the infection rate is not just going to spike again. And you can’t just do that blindly.”

But California’s great swab shortage is only the largest of a cascading array of supply-chain bottlenecks and resource constraints that have hampered the state’s ability to ramp up testing.

“We’ve been working seven days a week, two shifts per day,” said Christopher Catani, vice president of Hardy Diagnostics in Santa Maria, California, which produces the chemical goo used to transport test swabs to a lab while keeping any resident coronaviruses from degrading. “There are only a couple companies in the country that make that product so we’re pretty busy.”

A shortage of tests has stymied American lawmakers since the beginning of the pandemic. “Anybody that needs a test gets a test,” Trump proclaimed on March 6. It was not true then and it remains untrue. 

Earlier this month, Newsom established a testing taskforce, saying that he had “a responsibility as your governor to do better.” Since then Newsom has laid out six metrics that he and his advisors will be watching. 

When the state finally decides to relax its stay-at-home order will depend on progress on those metrics. “There is no date,” he said Wednesday. “If there is a date, then we’re denying the facts on the ground.”

Ramping up testing capacity is the first item on that six-part list. Newsom has set a goal of 25,000 new tests analyzed by the end of this month. At last count, he said the current number was 16,000.

But for months, suppliers have strained to meet the new demand for tests. 

Nasopharyngeal swabs are necessary to collect new samples from potential patients, but they are hardly high-tech pieces of equipment. They have to be long enough to collect mucus from where the back of the throat meets the nasal cavity. They have to be flexible enough not to impale the test subject in the process. And they have to be made of a synthetic material that won’t leave behind confounding bits of cotton or wood DNA. 

“Essentially it’s a little bit more sophisticated than a Q-tip,” is how President Trump put it in a press conference earlier this month.

But with only a handful of federally approved manufacturers — and one of the largest based in pandemic-ravaged northern Italy — the swab shortage has been particularly acute across the country. 

“You’d think it would be easy, “said Catani of Hardy Diagnostics, which is also in the business of buying and reselling swabs. “But that’s what happens when all the manufacturers aren’t in the US.” 

In Massachusetts, desperate healthcare workers have tapped engineers with 3D printers to pump out the necessary product. Last week, Parkdale-Mills, the parent company of U.S. Cotton, announced that it would begin producing a non-cotton product, the synthetic swabs. On Sunday, President Trump said he would be using the Korean War-era Defense Production Act to compel Puritan Medical Products, a manufacturer in Maine, to ramp up output for the federal government. 

It is unclear where the swab shipments designated for California will come from. Asked for details, the governor’s office referred questions to the state Department of Public Health, where a spokesperson declined to specify the source of the swabs, only that they were coming from the federal government.

Newsom said that his administration conducted a survey of personnel at 251 testing sites across the state. “Fifty to 55 percent of those surveyed said that their number one need is swabs,” said the governor.

Even if officials have solved California’s swab shortage, the scarcity of tests is not over.

Early on in the pandemic, the nation was gripped by a shortfall of lab processing capacity. 

That bottleneck was years in the making, said Rick Greenwood, a professor of environmental health science at UCLA and a consultant for the California Association of Public Health Lab Directors.

Since the late 1990s, more than 10 county public health labs have been shuttered or merged together across county lines.

“You get these highly trained people and particularly the smaller counties don’t want to or can’t come up with the salaries. So some of these labs closed because they couldn’t find a director,” he said. “When you lose a quarter of your capacity in your local labs, you’ve really done damage to the system.” 

On March 16, the FDA relaxed some of its guidelines around the types of tests, chemical compounds and labs that can be used to analyze samples once they’re collected. That has eased pressure on labs, though some public health officials worry that in a rush to keep up with statewide testing goals, accuracy will decline. 

“Everyone wants us to get back to work in the next week or month, but you have to wait for the science,” said Donna Ferguson, director of Monterey County’s public health lab. “I believe in using the most accurate tests and not using testing for testing’s sake.”

Ferrguson said that she has recently ramped up production, but only after hiring six graduate students to help with testing.

In recent weeks, capacity seems to have opened up, with industry groups of commercial labs reporting sharp drops in demand for their services — although public labs have not yet reported that decline in workload. The newfound capacity could reflect a drop off in new cases, or simply that the limiting factor is now a shortage of equipment needed to collect the samples in the first place.

“As soon as you solve for reagents, then you have to solve for RNA extraction, then you got to solve for swabs, then you’ve got to solve for viral transport, then you’ve got to solve for diagnostic timelines,” Newsom said Wednesday. “I don’t want to suggest definitively that even hundreds of thousands — even millions in the aggregate — of swabs will solve, quote-unquote, the testing issue. It will solve the swab issue.”

CalMatters.org is a nonprofit, nonpartisan media venture explaining California policies and politics.

Wednesday, April 22 Update

Sonoma County has just activated what they are calling a “Warm Line” for people to talk through any anxiety or emotional distress during the pandemic. People can call ( 707) - 565 - 2652 seven days a week from 10 a.m. to 7 p.m. Service in Spanish is available as well as interpretation for other languages.

At the other end of the line, counselors will offer support, guidance, and referrals.

Callers can also request a call be made to someone they are concerned about, which the county says will help to reach people who are isolated, lonely, and who may not reach out on their own.

In other news, at his daily briefing, Governor Gavin Newsom spoke about reopening hospitals to some non-emergency surgery.

Another big announcement from the governor – he’s organizing a cadre of 10,000 coronavirus contact tracers. This is a key component of the governor’s plan to reopen the state.

 

 

Restaurants, wineries, breweries and bars may now open in Sonoma County to serve outdoor meals.

Health Officer Dr. Sundari Mase issued an amended shelter-in-place that went into effect Saturday, May 23, that also expands childcare to include summer day-camp programs and allows drive-in ceremonies and drive-in movies. The modified order also now allows libraries to offer curbside pickup and clarifies that faith-based counseling may be delivered face-to-face when a virtual session is not possible. 

A press release on the changes says that outdoor activities pose less of risk of virus transmission than indoor activities, and patrons should be limited at tables to members of the same household.

Under the order, all businesses and organizations must follow local and state guidelines for health and safety, including developing a social-distancing protocol.

The county has also developed an app called the SoCo COVID-19 Check, available in the Apple App Store and Google Play Store, that employees should be using to verify that they are healthy enough to work. Businesses have until June 1 to adopt the app. 

Here’s a summary of the significant changes in this health order:

• Restaurants and food facilities may offer onsite sit-down outdoor meals
• Wineries, tasting rooms, bars, pubs, breweries and craft distilleries may offer: a) curbside pick-up, delivery, shipping; and b) sit-down outdoor meals in accordance with their land use permit and if the business has a food-facility permit (if applicable)
  • Questions pertaining to food-facility or host-facility permits? Contact Environmental Health at (707) 565-6565 or This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
  • Questions pertaining to land-use permits? Contact Permit Sonoma by email at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it..
• Summer day camps and other educational or recreational institutions or programs may provide childcare/supervision for children of all ages
• Ceremonies (including graduations and religious activities) may be conducted with household members attending in closed motorized vehicles

Find more information at socoemergency.org.

Sonoma County will allow nonessential retail businesses to offer curbside pick-up and delivery, and allow manufacturing and supply chain operations to function in support of approved businesses under a revised county health order.

The retail businesses include, but are not limited to, bookstores, jewelry stores, toy stores, clothing stores, shoe stores, home and furnishing stores, sporting goods stores, antique stores and music stores.

The updated order, effective as of Friday, May 8, coincides with the state’s move into phase two of its pandemic resilience roadmap, which allows businesses that pose a lesser COVID-19 threat to reopen. 

The governor’s roadmap is comprised of four stages for reopening and criteria that counties must meet prior to entering each stage. 

To accelerate further into stage two, counties must demonstrate, and public health officers attest to the state for review, that they have a low prevalence of COVID-19 spread; meet testing and contact tracing criteria; are prepared with health care system capacity to handle a sudden rise of cases; and have plans to protect vulnerable populations. 

County Health Officer Dr. Sundari Mase says Sonoma County still has work to do.

“Specifically, the County needs more time to demonstrate a low prevalence of COVID-19 and no COVID-19 deaths in the last 14 days. The County is close to meeting this criteria, and will continuously review for eligibility to expand business reopening,” her health order reads. 

All reopening businesses must implement social distancing and hygiene procedures based on state recommendations. In Sonoma County, businesses are encouraged to work with the Economic Development Board to develop, and begin planning to implement their protocols.

People at high risk of severe illness due to the virus are still encouraged to stay home as much as possible, and stores and shopping malls must still remain closed. 

“I concur with the Governor’s assessment of our success and need for continued vigilance,” County Health Officer Dr. Sundari Mase said. “We will continually assess whether we meet the State requirements and work with the business community to make sure we are able to safely reopen additional businesses as soon as conditions and the State permit.”

Read the entire updated order and find more information at socoemergency.org.

Sonoma County has loosened some of the restrictions of its shelter-in-place order, allowing some businesses, including construction, landscaping, plant nurseries, and car and bicycle retailers, to resume operations.

The loosening of restrictions comes as Gov. Gavin Newsom this week has approved similar reopenings for some retailers and manufacturers across the state. Health Officer Dr. Sundari Mase says the changes, which went into effect May 4, are possible because of progress in slowing the spread of COVID-19. 

“Opening the County up further is contingent upon our ability to keep up our efforts and reach critical milestones,” Mase said. “Our latest data shows staying at home prevented community spread of the virus. It is important that we now work to scale up testing and contact tracing to limit the spread of COVID-19 and keep people safe.”

The revised order eases restrictions on construction businesses, real estate/rental viewing and the following essential outdoor businesses where transmission risk is lower: arborists, landscaping, gardening, pool maintenance, plant nurseries and environmental site remediation services. The order also clarifies that florists are considered essential agriculture and that their retail sales can occur only via curbside, delivery or shipping. 

In addition, golfing is allowed, and automobile and bike retailers can operate.

Finally, the new order allows faith-based organizations to offer food, shelter, social services and other necessities of life for economically disadvantaged or otherwise needy individuals, and to provide counseling and host religious services through virtual streaming or similar technology.

Mase said she does not expect private or public mass gatherings to be permissible anytime soon.

The revised order does not have a specific end date, and can be amended as necessary. Mase will be working with the County Economic Development Board and industry leaders to develop specific COVID-19 mitigation measures to facilitate reopenings for all other businesses. Providing guidance to businesses is a component to move to phase two of the Governor’s Resilience Roadmap issued on April 28. 

Visit SoCoEmergency.org to read the full Shelter in Place Health Order and frequently asked questions that have been developed to clarify the order. 

By Adia White, Northern California Public Media

April 23, 2020

 

On Saturday, April 25, The Sonoma County Department of Health Services Disease Control Unit will begin testing health care workers with and without symptoms. The testing will be done in the parking lot of the Public Health Laboratory in Santa Rosa. Health care workers are encouraged to make an appointment in advance by calling (707) 565-4667.

The County eventually plans to open up testing to first responders with symptoms, those over 65 with underlying health conditions with or without symptoms, and any community member with symptoms.

 

Sonoma County recently received a shipment of medical swabs that are needed to perform coronavirus tests. These swabs have been in shortage nationwide and have limited the county's testing capacity.

 

During a press conference on Wednesday, April 22, Dr. Mase said the County hopes to perform 200 tests a day at the public health lab. Dr. Mase is also working on forming partnerships with clinics throughout the county to further expand testing. Governor Gavin Newsom announced on Tuesday that California would need to test 60,000 - 80,000 people daily in order to reopen the state. The state is currently testing around 16,000 people each day.

 

As of  Wednesday, April 23, the County has done 4,851 tests with 4% of tests coming back positive.

 

 

Despite its office being closed due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Sonoma County Human Services Department is continuing to help connect community members with public benefits.

On Monday, the department shared answers to some frequently asked questions about how COVID-19 may impact public benefits such as CalFresh, General Assistance, In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS), Medi-Cal and SonomaWORKS.

“It is important to know that some state and federal reporting requirements have been adjusted to ensure that you continue to receive benefits during this difficult time,” the department said in a press release.

See their answers to commonly asked questions below. For additional information or help, email This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. or call 707-565-5800. For ongoing updates about COVID-19 in Sonoma County, visit SoCoEmergency.org.

Applying for New Benefits

Q: If I need help paying for food for myself or my family, how can I apply for benefits?

A: Apply for CalFresh (a.k.a. food stamps or SNAP) online by visiting mybenefitscalwin.org or GetCalFresh.org, or apply by phone via 2-1-1. Please submit your application and required documentation, and your application interview will be waived. If you have CalFresh questions, call (877) 699-6868. For more information about the CalFresh program, please go to sonomacounty.ca.gov/Human-Services-Department.

Q: If I need cash assistance to help support my family, how can I apply for benefits?

A: SonomaWORKS (CalWORKs/TANF) provides temporary help to families with children who are having trouble making ends meet. Apply for SonomaWORKS online by visiting mybenefitscalwin.org. After you submit your application and required documentation, we will contact you to set up an application interview by phone. If you have questions about SonomaWORKS, please call (707) 565-5500. For more information about the SonomaWORKS program, visit sonomacounty.ca.gov/Human-Services-Department.

Q: I lost my health insurance or can no longer afford the cost as a result of losing my job, how can I apply for medical benefits?

A: Medi-Cal provides free or low-cost medical and dental coverage for eligible individuals and families, and has no interview requirement. To apply for Medi-Cal online, visit either mybenefitscalwin.org or coveredca.com. If you have any questions, please call (877) 699-6868.

Q: If I lost my job or had my hours reduced, how can I apply for unemployment?

A: If you have been laid off or had your scheduled hours reduced due to COVID-19, you can file an Unemployment Insurance claim online, by phone, or by mail. The Governor waived the one week waiting period for Unemployment Insurance, so you do not need to wait to apply. To file an unemployment insurance claim online, go to edd.ca.gov/Unemployment. Applying online is the best way to ensure that you get your benefits as quickly as possible. However, you can file a claim by phone: call (800) 300-5616 to apply in English or (800) 326-8937 to apply in Spanish.

Q: If I need help applying for unemployment, who can I call? 

A: For limited assistance with Unemployment Insurance applications, call Job Link at (707) 565-5596. To reach the local Employment Development Department (EDD) office, email This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. or call (707) 576-2850. Please leave a specific voicemail message and a staff member will respond to your call as soon as possible. 

Renewing Your Existing Benefits

Q: Do I need to call or visit a Human Services Department office to renew my CalFresh, General Assistance, or SonomaWORKS (CalWORKs) benefits?

A: You do not need to call nor visit one of our offices to renew your CalFresh, General Assistance, or SonomaWORKS (CalWORKs) benefits at this time. Current recipients will continue to get benefits at the same level (without interruption) for March, April, and May 2020. If you had a recertification due in March, April, or May 2020, expect to receive a letter saying that your recertification will be due six months from your original due date. For example, if your original recertification was due in March 2020, it will now be due in September 2020. This applies to both annual recertification and periodic reports (Semi-Annual Report, a.k.a. SAR 7). Regular reporting requirements for CalFresh, General Assistance, and SonomaWORKS are expected to resume in June 2020. 

Q: Will I be required to complete my work requirements during the COVID-19 crisis?

A: The work requirements for General Assistance and SonomaWORKS (CalWORKs) Welfare-to-Work have been waived for the months of March, April, and May 2020. If you are still able to complete your assigned activities, please turn in your attendance as usual. However, if you are unable to submit attendance during the COVID-19 crisis, you will not be penalized.

Q: What is a CalFresh Emergency Allotment?

A: The CalFresh Emergency Allotment is an increase to your benefits that will be automatically added to your EBT card for March and April 2020. The allotment will increase CalFresh benefits to the maximum amount for eligible household members (up to six individuals). You can expect the first allotment (for March) to be added to your EBT card on April 12th and the second allotment (for April) to be added on May 10th, 2020. If your household is already receiving the maximum amount for CalFresh, no additional benefits will be issued.

Q: If I lose my EBT card, can I still get it replaced?

A: Please call the customer service number at (877) 328-9677 to request a replacement EBT card. If you require an emergency replacement: CalFresh recipients can visit 2550 Paulin Drive in Santa Rosa and SonomaWORKS recipients can visit 2227 Capricorn Way, Suite 100, in Santa Rosa. The lobby doors will be locked; however, our reception staff will be available Monday - Friday between 8:00am - 4:30pm to assist you with this type of critical need. To protect yourself and others, we ask that you wear a face covering, wash your hands, and respect social distancing guidelines.

Q: If I lose my Medi-Cal Identification Card (BIC), can I still get it replaced?

A: Yes, please contact our service center at (877) 699-6868 to request a new Medi-Cal Identification Card (BIC). If you need to access services right away, most Medi-Cal providers can confirm your eligibility in their office by using your social security number. 

Q: What can I do if my children are currently covered by a Medi-Cal program with a monthly premium that I cannot afford as a result of COVID-19?

A: If your children receive health care coverage through the Medi-Cal For Families program and you cannot pay the premium due to COVID-19, you can request a waiver of your premium by calling the Medi-Cal For Families Payment Section at (800) 880-5305. 

Q: Do I need to call or visit a Human Services Department office to renew my Medi-Cal benefits?

A: No. Due to the Governor’s executive order, current Medi-Cal recipients will continue to receive benefits for March, April, and May 2020. All negative actions have been delayed for Medi-Cal beneficiaries and will be processed at a later date. If you receive information from the county, including renewal packets for Medi-Cal, please make sure to respond. Renewals can be returned via mail or uploaded via mybenefitscalwin.org.

Q: Will In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS) be impacted by COVID-19?

A: In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS) continues to provide services remotely. IHSS referrals can be made through the regular process of calling (707) 565-5900. IHSS social workers are working remotely and able to respond to calls, do outreach to vulnerable clients, and complete assessments by phone. Note that the state still currently requires an in-person interview for new IHSS applications, which will be completed once it is safe to do so.

Q: Does COVID-19 affect In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS) Payroll or Public Authority?

A: In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS) Payroll and Public Authority are providing all services, including supporting new provider enrollment and referring new providers to clients. Please call (707) 565-2852 for IHSS Payroll and (707) 565-5700 for IHSS Public Authority.  

Reporting Abuse or Neglect

Q: How can I report concerns about child abuse or neglect?

A: If a child is in immediate danger, call 9-1-1 right away. Otherwise, please call the confidential Child Protection Hotline at (707) 565-4304 or (800) 870-7064 to report your concerns regarding child neglect, parental abandonment, and emotional, physical, or sexual abuse.

Q: How can I report abuse or neglect concerns about an older adult or dependent adult?

A: If you are concerned that an older adult (age 60+) or dependent adult (age 18+) may be experiencing neglect or emotional, physical, financial, or sexual abuse, please call the confidential Adult Protective Services (APS) Hotline at (707) 565-5940 or (800) 667-0404.

At the Sonoma County Library, the shift from physical books and resources to digital ones has been slow but steady over the past few years.

“Every year, we see more and more patrons checking out electronic books, streaming movies, tracing their family tree or conducting research,” Library Director Ann Hammond said in a press release. “Some of our most loyal and active patrons rarely come into a branch.”

But since closing all of its branches due to the coronavirus pandemic and county shelter-in-place orders on March 14, the library reports a dramatic spike in its digital circulation numbers.

OverDrive, a popular way to check out electronic books and audiobooks through the library, had a 356 percent increase in use from March 17 to April 8. In the same period, the library’s Hoopla platform, which offers books, films, TV, music, comics and more, had a 786 percent increase.

Kanopy, a resource for classic films and documentaries, had a 298 percent increase, and RBDigital, which connects readers with thousands of current issues and back issues of magazines, saw the largest jump with a 2,434 percent increase in use.

The library says patrons are discovering all of the digital resources available to them for free with a library card — enabling them to do things like learn languages with Mango, brush up on software skills with Lynda, decide what home appliance to purchase with Consumer Reports, research car repairs with Chilton, look up ancestors on Ancestry.com, or read the New York Times.

And Hammond doesn’t think the shift to digital will be temporary.

“There is no substitute for a one-on-one conversation with a friendly librarian, or attending a library event, or bringing your child to a story time, but a lot of our patrons are discovering how easy it is to try the digital option, and we’ll be prepared to keep supporting them,” she said. “We’ve already added or expanded digital resources, and we will keep looking for ways to serve our community, in person or online.”

One enduring concern, however, is that not everyone has access to the Internet. 

“We have free high speed WiFi in our branches, and it’s still on during the closures so people can access it from outside when the building structure permits,” Hammond said. “We also have more than 500 WiFi hotspots and more than 100 Chromebooks in circulation, but it’s not nearly enough.”

Hammond says when branches eventually reopen, the library will continue to advocate on behalf of those who can’t afford broadband.

“This is a wake-up call for every library in America,” she said. “We can’t close the digital divide by ourselves, but we intend to be loud and persistent voices in finding a solution.”

Sonoma County’s health officer has issued a new order requiring all congregate care facilities to screen all staff and visitors for signs of illness and adhere to a strict mask-wearing policy to slow the spread of COVID-19. 

The order, which went into effect April 17, applies to all medical care facilities, licensed residential care facilities, including nursing and senior care facilities, psychiatric facilities, group homes, residential recovery houses and homeless shelters. 

The order stipulates that before starting work, all staff in congregate settings and first responders must perform a symptom screen and have their temperature taken.

(Image: Sailors assigned to the hospital ship USNS Mercy admit a patient in Los Angeles, March 29, 2020. Credit: US Nacy)

Anyone who is not a patient or resident at a patient care facility must wear a medical-grade isolation or surgical mask at all times while in the facility, and submit to a temperature and symptom screening upon entry.

“It’s critical that we do all we can to protect our first responders, medically vulnerable patients, and people who must be cared for outside the home in congregate settings,” said Susan Gorin, chair of the Board of Supervisors. “This country has already witnessed how quickly the virus can spread in these settings.”

Non-clinical facilities that provide overnight care and day services have the option of requiring staff and visitors to wear fabric or cloth face coverings instead of medical-grade masks.

Additional requirements for patient care facilities include social distancing in meal and break rooms, and avoiding the use of employees or staff who have worked at another facility within the past 14 days.

The order defines first responders as those who provide 24/7 emergency response, first aid care, or other related assistance either in the course of the person’s occupational duties or as a volunteer, such as peace officers, emergency medical technicians, firefighters, rescue workers, certain social workers and certain animal control officers.

Visit SoCoEmergency.org to read the order or for more information about COVID-19.

Additional groups of high-risk and vulnerable people will now be able to get tested for COVID-19 at Sonoma County’s drive-thru testing site at the county’s Public Health Laboratory.

The site, operated by the Department of Health Services (DHS) Disease Control Unit, will now be available to the following groups:

• Health care workers (with or without symptoms)
• First responders (with or without symptoms)
  • First responders include people who provide 24/7 emergency response, first aid care, or other related assistance either in the course of the person’s occupational duties or as a volunteer and include:
    • Police officers
    • Firefighters
    • Paramedics and EMTs
    • Emergency Response Social Workers
• Symptomatic people over 65 years of age
• Symptomatic people with underlying health conditions
• All essential workers (with or without symptoms)
  • Examples of essential workers include:
    • grocery store workers,
    • In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS) caregivers,
    • construction workers,
    • utility workers
    • childcare providers,
    • or anyone who has continued to work under the Shelter in Place health order in an essential function.

The tests are free and available by appointment only by calling (707) 565-4667. The testing site is located at 3313 Chanate Road in Santa Rosa.

The other options for testing in Sonoma County are:

• State testing sites:
  Testing is available at sites operated by OptumServe, a health services contractor for the State of California. Testing locations are in Santa Rosa and Petaluma. Appointments can be made online at https://lhi.care/covidtesting. People without internet access or who need to make an appointment in a language other than English can call 1-888-634-1123. Information and frequently asked questions are available at socomergency.org/sonoma-county-increases-covid-19-testing-with-two-new-community-testing-sites/.
• Through your medical provider:
  Individuals with coronavirus symptoms should still contact their medical providers to seek treatment and testing.

All tests are free and available regardless of immigration status. There is currently no coronavirus antibodies test. 

“Community-wide testing is a critical step toward re-opening the County,” said Dr. Sundari Mase, county health officer. “Expanded testing allows us to identify and increase our understanding of COVID-19 community spread. This includes collecting a broad sample of results, including data from those in specific groups and those who do not have symptoms. Upwards of 30% of people who test positive experience no symptoms, but can still spread the disease.”

Find the latest updates regarding the coronavirus emergency, local resources and other helpful information at SoCoEmergency.org.

Sonoma County is establishing an alternative care site (ACS) at Sonoma State University where about 580 patients can be treated in the event of a COVID-19 surge.

The site will be operated by the Petaluma Health Center, and patients will be placed in the Recreation Center and in a portion of the residential housing area on the SSU campus.

The county has been using COVID-19 modeling data to inform the development of an ACS to support local hospitals and has been working with health care providers and partners to identify the types of patients that might seek care, and facilities that might be needed. SSU was selected from a number of sites.

“We're grateful to Sonoma State for filling such an important role," said Susan Gorin, chair of the Board of Supervisors. "Having alternate care sites will be crucial if our hospitals experience a surge in patients. We hope we won't be in that situation, but it's imperative we plan for it and have resources ready."

The gymnasiums in the Recreation Center will be used for COVID-19-positive patients with mild-to-moderate symptoms, while the residential units will be used for those who are awaiting test results for COVID-19. A separate residential housing complex will be used for COVID-19 vulnerable individuals — those who are over the age of 65 and those with underlying medical conditions. The county said capacity at the site can be increased if necessary.

State Sen. Mike McGuire, who represents a significant portion of the county, was a proponent of having an ACS at SSU.

"This is a historic, all-hands-on-deck effort to expand our hospital capacity across this state and here at home in Sonoma County,” he said. “Opening up these over 500 beds will be a huge boost to expanding our local surge capacity. We are truly grateful for the one hundred percent partnership between Sonoma State University and the County of Sonoma — we know there’s much more work ahead.”

On April 1, the California Department of Public Health released a data dashboard that tracks coronavirus hospitalizations by county. 

The dashboard shows the number of hospitalizations reported each day in connection with the virus. Patients are listed in four categories: hospitalized patients who have tested positive for the virus, hospitalized patients suspected of having the virus due to exhibiting symptoms typically found in COVID-19, patients in intensive care who tested positive for the virus, and patients in intensive care suspected of having the virus.

In Sonoma County as of April 28, with 71% of hospitals (93% of licensed beds) reporting to the state, there are 9 suspected COVID-19 patients and 1 positive patient. 

Anytime there’s a significant news event — like a global pandemic, for example — you can expect misinformation to spread across the Internet. 

“Fake news” means stories that contain fabricated information, or information that’s based on rumor, shoddy methodology or a partisan agenda.

With the coronavirus, popular fake news stories have included reports that the virus is a manmade bioweapon and that it can be cured by eating garlic or high doses of Vitamin C, among many others.

A Pew Research Center study found that about half of U.S. adults (48%) report having come across at least some news and information about COVID-19 that seemed completely made up, with 12% saying they have seen a lot of it and 35% saying they have seen some.

In light of the prevalence of these dubious stories, we wanted to share some tips for identifying fake news and finding information you can trust.

Spotting Fake Stories

Tip 1: Check the source

Click away from the story to look into who the publisher is, read the site’s “About Us” page or mission statement, check the domain name (be wary of unusual top-level domain names, like “.com.co.), investigate who the author is and what else they’ve published. Does everything seem credible, real and trustworthy?

Tip 2: Read beyond the headline

Headlines can be misleading — often written with sensational claims to get clicks. What’s the whole story? If the story seems outlandish, make sure it’s not a piece of satire.

Tip 3: Pay attention to quality and date

Spelling errors and dramatic capitalization don’t fly at credible news outlets. Also, check when the story was published. Re-publishing old stories can take information out of context. 

Tip 4: Check the sources and citations

Credible journalism is led by gathering facts from people, documents and other publications, which means you should see quoted material in the story with named sources and links, when relevant, to information that supports what’s written. If you came across the story on social media, make sure to click through to the story and investigate the publisher as outlined in Tip 1. You can’t always trust what’s shared by your friends.

Tip 5: Check your biases

Does the story tell you what you want to hear? Does it only confirm what you already suspected? Consider if your own beliefs could affect your judgment.

Tip 6: Consult professional fact-checkers or experts

There are many websites dedicated to debunking false information online. Google the topic + fact check, ask a librarian, or do your own detective work to determine fact from fiction. 

COVID-19 Sources to Trust

When it comes to the current coronavirus pandemic, the best places to turn to for reliable, trustworthy information are public health organizations and officials, your local and state government, and nonprofit news organizations. 

Locally, you can look to your county and its Department of Public Health or Office of Emergency Services for updates and resources. (In Sonoma County, that would be https://socoemergency.org/.)

For state information, look to the Governor’s Office or state Department of Public Health. California Gov. Gavin Newsom has been holding daily briefings on the crisis most days at noon (look to his Twitter page for announcements), and the CDPH is keeping track of case count totals and providing other resources.

Federal organizations to turn to for factual health information include the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the World Health Organization.

Local news organizations (like NorCal Public Media!) are also great places to turn to for the latest news and context. 

Above all, it’s important when consuming the news to maintain curiosity, be reflective about what you’re reading, actively investigate your sources and look for in-depth coverage. Take breaks when you need to — there’s way more information out there than is necessary for you to stay safe and healthy.

Citations for this story include:

Cornell University
Harvard University
Pew Research Center
NewsGuard

 

As COVID-19 continues to spread across the nation, understanding the pandemic’s effect on your local area can be difficult.

That’s why four public media organizations have collaborated to create the California COVID-19 Tracker — a data dashboard that provides a localized look at COVID-19-related cases and deaths in each county, as well as a risk assessment for each county’s population.

The tracker also looks at how many people in each county are at high risk for a severe case of the disease by showing how many residents are 65 and older, suffer from chronic respiratory disease, cardiovascular disease and diabetes. 

Case and death data is collected by hand by reporters for CapRadio, KQED and KPCC from each public health department or county’s individual site each evening. They update the data daily at 7 or 8 p.m, and many jurisdictions post in the late afternoon. 

Track county hospitalizations and skilled nursing facility caseson the California Department of Public Health website. 

This dashboard was created by Allie Kanik at Louisville Public Media, Lisa Pickoff-White at KQED, Emily Zentner at CapRadio and Dana Amihere at KPCC.

  

 

By Adia White, Northern California Public Media

Updated May 3, 2020

 

Sonoma County is launching two new coronavirus testing sites in Santa Rosa and Petaluma that will be open to community members with and without symptoms. The sites will open on Tuesday, May 5, and are provided through the State of California in partnership with the private company, OptumServe.

 

Tests are available by appointment only. To make an appointment call 1-888-634-1123 or visit https://lhi.care/covidtesting. According to a press releasesent out by the County of Sonoma, tests will be available for free for community members without insurance. Insurance companies will be billed for all other tests. 

(Image: COVID-19 test kits. Credit: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.)
 

The two new testing sites in Sonoma County are a part of Governor Gavin Newsom's plan to expand testing capacity statewide. On April 22, Governor Newsom announced his office would launch at least 80 new testing sites across the state. These sites will increase the state's testing capacity by more than 10,500 tests per day and the County's testing capacity by more than 260 tests per day.

 

In a press release, Board Chair Susan Gorin said that “This will help us get reach our goal of conducting 600 - 800 tests per day, which will help us to understand the spread of COVID-19 here in Sonoma County – a critical step toward opening the County back up.”

 

Increased testing capacity is one of six criteria that Governor Gavin Newsom said will drive the state's decision to lift shelter in place.  Other criteria include preventing infection in people who are most at risk, being able to handle surges in hospitals, developing therapeutics to meet demand, ensuring businesses, schools, and child care facilities can support physical distancing, and setting criteria as to when to reinstate the stay-at-home order if need be.

ByJulie Cart, CalMatters

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on Friday recommended every American wear a face mask while in public to protect against contracting coronavirus. 

The agency announced that non-medical fabric masks – even scarves or bandannas – could help slow the spread of the infection. State health officials earlier in the week made the same recommendation. 

The ever-evolving response to the coronavirus pandemic has amped up the need for keeping everyone safe from the virus.

That means wearing masks.

(Image: Food bank volunteer Betty Kimmel wears a protective mask as she hands out oranges to seniors at Teamsters 315 Hall in Martinez on March 19, 2020. Photo by Anne Wernikoff for CalMatters)

What is the purpose of a face mask?

It depends on who is wearing it.

Humans have long covered their faces to ward off disease, and medical masks have a long and colorful history .

For most of the public and some healthcare workers, “the main purpose of a mask is not to protect yourself from others, but to protect others from you,” said Bill Padula, an assistant professor at the University of Southern California’s School of Pharmacy.

Padula, who studies patient and worker safety in hospitals, said medical masks are designed to protect the wearer from contact with an infected patient.

“It isn’t simply thinking about what I have to do for this patient sitting in front of me, but ‘How do I treat this patient, with respect to the next  10 patients who walk into this clinic?’” he said.

In its new guidelines set Friday, the CDC said studies have shown that “a significant portion” of people with the virus have no symptoms and can still spread the virus. “In light of this new evidence, CDC recommends wearing cloth face coverings in public settings where other social distancing measures are difficult to maintain (e.g., grocery stores and pharmacies) especially in areas of significant community-based transmission.”

Which masks are in short supply?

The highly-contagious coronavirus requires doctors, nurses and other clinicians to take extra precautions when treating patients. With more than 1 million people worldwide infected, there is a critical shortage of N95 masks and surgical masks — the types worn by healthcare providers.

The N95 respirator mask is a polymer cup designed to fit snugly to the face to form a seal, and filters out nearly 95% of airborne particles. The federal government suggests they not be reused or shared.

In contrast, surgical masks are made with multi-layered fabric, commonly pleated, with bands that hook over ears, and are worn loosely. They are designed to provide a physical barrier that prevents the spread of germs from person to person.

They also are not intended to be used more than once.

But in both cases, hospital officials in hard-hit cities such as New York have rationed the masks and are washing and reusing them.

The situation is made worse by the fact that about half of the world’s supply of medical masks is manufactured in China, with many of the factories located in Wuhan, thought to be the epicenter of the coronavirus outbreak.

What about other types of masks, will they work?

In many fire-prone communities around California, homeowners and local community emergency agencies maintain stocks of masks intended to protect the wearer from wildfire smoke.

Some of these are known as P95 masks, often recommended by fire officials for use by residents during wildfires. The masks — sometimes referred to as dust masks — are fitted with a small carbon filter, designed to protect against oil-based particles.

They work well in many applications, but are not considered medical-grade masks and are “not commensurate with current U.S. standards of care,” according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 

Federal guidelines go on to say, however, that P95 masks, alone or in combination with other measures, are acceptable when there are shortages of N95 respirators. “These devices are expected to be suitable alternatives to provide protection during the COVID-19 response when supplies are short,” the CDC guidelines say. 

The guidelines do not say why P95 masks, which block the same percentage of particles as the others, do not meet federal standards for health care workers. It is likely that they have not been fully studied to ensure that their filtration ability, seal and other factors meet the needs of hospitals, since they were not designed for that use.

How about donating those wildfire masks to hospitals and local clinics?

Napa City Council Member Liz Alessio organized a local donation drive that gleaned some 45,000 masks, the bulk of them surgical masks but some from people’s stocks of P95 masks.

The region’s vulnerability to wildfire meant that “folks had masks in their homes and businesses,” Allesio said. “There’s a lot more out there.”

Health care officials are most appreciative.

“We are humbled by the outpouring of support we have received from our communities and business partners to help source additional supplies,” healthcare HMO Kaiser Permanente said in a statement to CalMatters.

But the company said it was organizing a donation network and discouraged people from bringing donations directly to medical centers.

The California Department of Public Health told CalMatters that while the P95 fire masks are “highly effective,”  it is “up to the individual medical institution to decide if they are acceptable for use by personnel.”

At least one hospital told Allesio that it would not be able to use the donated P95 masks because they didn’t meet the hospital’s requirements. 

Medical masks are regulated by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health and the federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration.

The state launched a website where individuals and companies can donate or sell scarce medical supplies, including masks. The site specifically mentions N95 and surgical masks only.

Ok, what are the rest of us supposed to do?

Before this week, officials downplayed the need for most people to wear masks when they are out in public, provided they practice appropriate physical distancing. Then, as it became more clear that there are unknown numbers of asymptomatic people officials are now urging everyone to use face coverings, as well as remain at least six feet apart.

There is a wide variety and many gradations of face masks anyone can use, including rudimentary paper dust masks, often used for home DIY projects.

Barbara Ferrer, director of the Los Angeles County Public Health Department, said that for most people, a homemade mask using tightly woven cotton fabric, a bandanna or scarf affords sufficient protection.

“There really is no need for anyone in the public to go and secure N95 masks, I beg you not to,” she said.  “They are needed by medical workers or health care workers.”

CalMatters.org is a nonprofit, nonpartisan media venture explaining California policies and politics.

ByJackie Botts,Ben Christopher,Elizabeth Castillo,Ana B. Ibarra andMatt Levin, CalMatters

Cities have been ground zero in California’s coronavirus response — with many initiating shelter-in-place orders, organizing emergency housing for homeless people and supporting health and essential workers. But even before restrictions get lifted, mayors, managers and city councils are being tested in a new way: pandemic-induced budget deficits. 

Already, unemployment is projected to be higher than it was during the Great Recession. Sales and property tax revenues have cratered. And while some of a $150 billion Coronavirus Relief Fund tucked into the federal stimulus CARES Act will go directly to large cities with a population of 500,000 or more, the League of California Cities has already declared it insufficient. 

Across California cities, the clamor for a federal bailout is growing. Whatever reserve they may have built up during the recovery is being wiped out and replaced by red ink. City hall leaders now face an unsavory menu of service cuts, furloughs and staff reductions. Public employee pension and health care obligations will only add to the pain. 

(Image: A woman pushes a cart past the shuttered Fox Theater in downtown Oakland on March 25, 2020. Photo by Anne Wernikoff for CalMatters)

Here’s a look at California’s 10 largest cities and how they’re responding to the coronavirus fallout:

Los Angeles: Big promises in California’s biggest city

With just under a fifth of California’s confirmed cases in his city, Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti has frequently acted like a governor, often steps ahead of Gov. Gavin Newsom.

Garcetti, a Democrat, halted all evictions in mid-March, weeks before California courts did the same statewide. The city has mounted 26 free testing sites, where anyone with symptoms can get tested within two days. Last week Garcetti ordered residents to cover their faces in public, a move the state has not yet taken. 

When the mayor announced a philanthropic fund to send cash cards to families, particularly those with undocumented immigrant members, 56,000 immediately applied. 

Despite his rising profile as “storyteller-in-chief,” Garcetti’s big plans have sometimes fallen short. He initially promised to set up 6,000 beds for homeless individuals, but it’s now more likely to be 2,000.

All these initiatives cost big money even as sales tax revenues dry up. In a recent address, Garcetti said he expected a 30% to 40% drop in the city’s hotel occupancy tax and significant decreases in sales tax revenue. Unemployment could soar to 20%. 

The mayor has moved $20 million from city reserves into an emergency COVID-19 response fund, but he said the city needs help.

“There’s no question though that we’re going to have cuts,” Garcetti said. “I’m imploring our Congress, I’m imploring our president to make sure the next round (of relief) also helps bail out cities.”

San Diego: Beach town facing budget deficit

Newsom praised San Diego for taking early and bold action to house the region’s 8,000 homeless people, including procuring more than 2,000 hotel rooms as emergency isolation units. Mayor Kevin Faulconer led an effort to turn the San Diego Convention Center into a massive homeless shelter, taking in more than 800 people without stable housing. 

But those extraordinary measures come with extraordinary bills for California’s second largest city. The repurposing of the convention center will cost $2.8 million per month; the hotel rooms, $6 million per month. 

While federal, state and county dollars will offset some of those costs, the city’s coffers will be strained at a time when hotel tax and sales tax receipts—two key revenue streams in the tourism-centric city—are plummeting. The city faces a $250 million deficit, and Faulconer has called for cuts to libraries, recreation centers and the arts to make up the shortfall. 

“Make no mistake, these are going to be some of the most significant cutbacks in San Diego history,” the Republican mayor said in late March. 

San Jose: A $100 million hit to Silicon Valley

San Jose’s budget will take at least a $100 million hit because of the coronavirus pandemic, according to Mayor Sam Liccardo. And that’s still an early projection. He wouldn’t be surprised if it will be worse. “This is going to be a rough ride,” said the Democrat.

Residents have seen it before: The city endured a painful pension battle in the aftermath of the last recession, eventually losing a third of its workforce due to a hiring freeze, pay cuts and employee attrition. 

Now, Silicon Valley is taking another blow as a viral hotspot. Last month, the fire department had to manage an outbreak of COVID-19 cases among its first responders. As one of the regions to be hit early, Santa Clara County was among six counties that initiated a shelter-in-place order on March 17, two days before a statewide order went into effect.

Still, the area is resilient. To help people impacted by the pandemic, the community created Silicon Valley Strong, which has raised more than $20 million to help the area’s most vulnerable residents, small businesses and nonprofits.

The current relief bill should help reimburse the city’s emergency response efforts but Liccardo hopes to see more financial help from Washington, D.C. 

San Francisco: First to lockdown yet homeless remain unsheltered 

San Francisco has been upheld as a model for how to deal with the pandemic but Mayor London Breed isn’t resting on her laurels. During the 1918 Spanish Flu, San Francisco introduced aggressive social distancing in the fall, tamping down the initial outbreak, only to open back up prematurely, with lethal consequences.

This year’s positive gains to date have — like all of San Francisco’s achievements — been marred by its most conspicuous failing: the city’s massive unsheltered homeless population.  

So far more than 90 residents and 10 staff at San Francisco’s largest shelter have tested positive for coronavirus, the largest single cluster of cases in the city. It’s fueled criticism that the city has failed to protect its most vulnerable.  

Earlier this week, San Francisco’s board of supervisors passed an ordinance demanding that Breed’s administration lease 8,250 hotel rooms, to get the estimated 8,000 people living on the street in doors by April 26. So far, the city has leased about 2,000 and sheltered nearly 800 people.

“There is no way we’re going to be able to accomplish the goals of the ordinance,” said Breed, a Democrat. Supervisors hope she rises to the challenge.

San Francisco is trying to ramp up services just as its finances are being gutted. The city’s controller recently estimated the pandemic will push the city between $1.1 and $1.7 billion into the red over the next two years — wiping out the city’s $800 million in reserves. 

But those estimates are preliminary and depend on just how hard this all hits the economy — one with plenty of stay-at-home-ready tech workers, but also a disproportionate number of tourism, hospitality and restaurant workers. 

“We’re in the middle of an unprecedented economic shock and we’re in the middle of a bit of data vacuum,” said Ted Egan, chief economist for the city. “There’s not a lot we do know at this point.”

Fresno: ‘Want our economy to come back’

Fresno Mayor Lee Brand first issued a shelter-in-place order for his city of more than 500,000 people on March 18, one day before the governor asked all Californians to stay at home. For the most part, the order is working, he said. 

“People in Fresno get it, they’re staying at home, they want our economy to come back,” Brand said.

Prior to coronavirus, Fresno’s economy was in one of the best shapes it had been in a long time. After struggling for years to jump back from the last recession, the city’s 2020 budget boasted $34 million in reserves, the biggest in the city’s history, he said. In recent years, the city hired more police officers and boosted city services. 

“We are the only city in California with a fully funded pension,” said the Republican mayor. 

Last May, the city even hit a new mark: an unemployment rate under 5%. More often, Fresno’s unemployment rate is typically higher than state and national averages.  

Now those gains are threatened. People are losing jobs and sales tax, a big source of city revenue, is being significantly impacted. Brand said he’d like to see cities included in another round of relief funding from the federal government. 

Locally, the city set up a $750,000 fund to help small businesses. The relief program allows owners to apply for a zero-interest loan that will be forgiven after one year if their business is still operating. 

Sacramento: Capital city seeks assistance

A recent influx of Bay Area transplants will help the sixth-largest city in California qualify for nearly $90 million in federal assistance from the Coronavirus Relief Fund.

Sacramento Mayor Darrell Steinberg hopes that money can buoy city coffers as California’s capital braces for a prolonged downturn. The budget for the remainder of this fiscal year, which ends June 30, should hold — but cuts loom.

“We’re going to have to figure out how to make it up,” said Steinberg spokeswoman Mary Lynne Vellinga. “We’re hoping there will be some more assistance coming down the pike.”

Sacramento will also be tested in its response to a growing population of people experiencing homelessness. Steinberg, a Democrat and co-chair of a statewide homelessness task force, has instructed staff to come up with longer-term housing strategies for people placed in temporary hotels or trailers.

Long Beach: Burning through overtime

Long Beach projects revenue losses and increased expenses brought on by the coronavirus pandemic will cost the city between $38 million and $44 million during the current fiscal year ending in September. And that’s optimistic.

City finance director John Gross noted his projections assume the city will enter a recovery period soon after May. Otherwise, he warns, the city “should be prepared for more adverse impacts.”

Long Beach is being hit by the loss of sales tax, oil revenue and a transient occupancy tax, which is paid by hotel guests. The city is also burning through staff overtime and other costs associated with its response. 

The city closed down on March 19, following Los Angeles County’s “safer at home” order. So far, the majority of the city’s deaths have been linked to nursing homes and long-term care facilities.

The city has opened a free clinic at Long Beach City College, where people can be assessed and referred to testing for COVID-19. Near the clinic, the city also opened a drive-thru testing site. The centers are staffed by the city’s own Long Beach Medical Reserve Corps, a program that was in place years before the state’s recently launched Health Corps. 

Oakland: Exacerbating economic and racial inequalities

On March 9, long before most mayors had to contend with the possibility of a pandemic, the Grand Princess, a ship full of contagious cruise takers, docked in the Port of Oakland. 

“That’s the moment it went from being a problem in the world to a problem right here at home,” said Mayor Libby Schaaf, a Democrat. 

Since then the city, like much of the Bay Area, has — so far — not seen the massive death tolls and overcrowded hospitals that were once forecast. But the pandemic has exacerbated the city’s long-standing economic and racial inequalities, said Schaaf. 

Even with San Francisco across the bay, 15% of Oakland households do not have Internet access. Of the 1,100 small business owners who applied for emergency relief from a city-sponsored charity fund, seven out of 10 made less than 35% of the area’s median income. 

The municipal budget has been “decimated,” Schaaf said. The city has already laid off hundreds of temporary workers.

Some of Oakland’s pre-pandemic responses to homelessness are helping. The creation of one-person shed camps and sanctioned RV parks for the homeless has reduced shelter crowding — a potential contagion cluster. 

Schaaf said the city is planning to move 50 people from those group shelters into hotels. She said she hopes to convert many into permanent housing though funding is now scarce.

Bakersfield: Missed out on stimulus funding

The city of nearly 400,000 residents failed to qualify for direct federal aid under the Coronavirus Relief Fund because of the population cutoff. But Bakersfield will be able to cushion the blow thanks to a local sales tax measure passed two years ago to bolster the economy and reduce homelessness.

The tax increase has generated more than $50 million. While about half has already been allocated, money can still be tapped to help deal with the local downturn, said City Manager Christian Clegg.

“It is a saving grace,” he said. “We’ll have to be really strategic, but we’ll actually have some ability to do a few new things next year when most cities will be cutting back.”

Still, Clegg is expecting a double-digit reduction in sales tax revenue and hopes Congress will reduce the population threshold in the next round of stimulus spending.  

Meanwhile, the county continues to battle the virus as the number of confirmed cases rises in Kern County. As of this week, the county reported nearly 500 COVID-19 cases with more than 300 in patients between the ages of 18 and 49.

Anaheim: An economy built on crowds

Anaheim made international headlines when Disneyland closed for the third time in history in early March, sputtering the local economy to a halt.

The pandemic has hit the city’s workforce and budget hard — both depend heavily on large groups of people bumping up against each other in the city’s theme parks, hotels and convention centers. The city believes that at least 10,000 workers in the tourism industry have lost jobs and predicts a minimum revenue loss of at least $10 million, mostly from hotel and sales tax, said city spokesman Mike Lyster.

While the city has left public health management to Orange County, it has used $1.4 million in state funds to open a third homeless shelter and has repurposed the Honda Center, usually home to the Anaheim Ducks ice hockey team, to house food bank distributions for thousands of people at a time.

Already Republican Mayor Harry Sidhu, himself the owner of several El Pollo Loco franchises, says he has a $15 million plan to restart the economy. It includes $8 million to support seniors, workers who have lost jobs and people who are struggling with rent. Nearly all of the rest would go to VisitAnaheim.org, the city’s main driver of tourism, which has laid off half of its staff. City leaders are cautiously optimistic that some restaurants could open for dine-in business again in May or June.

“The challenge for finances is getting our economy moving again as soon as it’s safe to do so,” Sidhu said. “But we know economic recovery will be gradual.”

CalMatters.org is a nonprofit, nonpartisan media venture explaining California policies and politics.

We put the call out for your questions related to the coronavirus pandemic, and you’ve submitted questions about financial help, case counts, reopenings and more.

Listener Gigi Pravda wrote in, asking: How do I apply for unemployment benefits if under Asylum Status? How do I find financial resources in San Mateo County in the interim?

Our South Bay reporter Pamela Lorence looked into it. Here’s what she found.

(Image: Transmission electron microscopic image of an isolate from the first U.S. case of COVID-19, formerly known as 2019-nCoV. CDC / Hannah A Bullock; Azaibi Tamin)

Answer: 

Unemployment for immigrants

To collect UI benefits, you must show that you were in satisfactory immigration status and authorized to work in the United States when earning the wages you used to establish your claim. You must also give proof that you are currently in satisfactory immigration status, and are authorized to work each week that you claim benefits.

Note: The EDD verifies immigration status and work authorization through the Department of Homeland Security.

You can file an unemployment insurance claim online at https://edd.ca.gov/Unemployment/UI_Online.htm.

If immigration status is questionable, this fund from private donations can help: https://www.immigrantfundca.org/

San Mateo financial resources

San Mateo County pandemic-related resources, including financial, food, health and housing resources, can be found at https://cmo.smcgov.org/covid-19-resources.

Also in San Mateo County, the Office of Community Affairs has a list of resources specifically for immigrants: https://cmo.smcgov.org/immigrant-services

Immigrants Rising in San Francisco may also be able to answer specific questions: https://immigrantsrising.org/resource/tangible-support-for-immigrant-communities-during-covid-19/

Do you have a coronavirus-related question? Submit it using the form at the right or at norcalpublicmedia.org/coronavirus. We answer questions weekly on our virtual Town Hall each Tuesday at 7 p.m.

We put the call out for your questions related to the coronavirus pandemic, and you’ve asked about the reopening of additional business, youth sports, testing and more. 

Here are a few answers to some of those recent question submissions. We answer more each Tuesday night during our virtual coronavirus Town Hall with Sonoma County Health Officer Dr. Sundari Mase. If you have a question, please submit it using the form at the right.

Note: Our last Town Hall is scheduled for June 2. We want to know: what's the best way to get you continuing coronavirus information after that date? Let us know by using the submission form to the right and mark "Future coronavirus coverage" for question category.

When will barbershops, indoor shopping and religious services reopen in Sonoma County? —Angela, Deborah, Michelle, Barry

Even though Gov. Gavin Newsom gave approval this week for California counties who meet state requirements to begin reopening barbershops and allowing indoor shopping and religious services, those activities are still not permitted in Sonoma County.

Dr. Mase said there’s been an increase in local COVID-19 cases over the past two weeks — partly due to increased contact tracing, but also due to community transmission — that merits caution. 

“I don’t think we’ve seen the full impact of what we’ve just altered with our recent shelter-in-place order, with the amendments, and so I think we’re going to wait a little bit to see where we’re going in order to protect the community,” she said.

Those recent amendments have included allowing outdoor dining at restaurants, bars and wineries, and drive-through religious services, among other changes.

Mase noted that the governor’s order applies to counties of all different sizes, with different case rates and testng capabilities. 

“It’s meant for counties to look at their own situations and then make decisions as to how to move forward,” she said.

She said the county will be monitoring on a daily basis the rate of cases, the level of community transmission, the effects on vulnerable populations, PPE and hospital bed availability and other relevant data to make decisions about further reopening. 

Are youth sports allowed under the recent health order amendment that allows summer day camps and other recreational programs? —David

“I think any camp is fine as long as the guidance is met,” Mase said. 

The health order limits these types of programs to 12 kids or fewer per group, and the same instructor and children should be maintained in each group.

Find more details in the full health order on the county website.

How often do you recommend that members of the public get tested if we do not have symptoms? Does the recommendation change based on our job? —Anonymous

Mase said you don’t typically need to get retested after an initial COVID-19 test.

“I think people need baseline testing, and then if they become symptomatic or if they’ve had an exposure to someone with COVID, then they should be retested,” she said.

Symptoms include fever, shortness of breath, and a cough, among others. Information on how and where to get tested can be found at SoCoEmergency.org.

Watch Tuesday's Town Hall program here. Mase's interview begins at 35:45.