in a case in which a young man used the app's "speed filter" feature before a fatal crash. Richard Drew/AP hide caption

toggle caption Richard Drew/AP

A federal appeals court on Tuesday ruled that Snapchat should be held legally responsible in a case in which a young man used the app's "speed filter" feature before a fatal crash.

Richard Drew/AP

Three young men got into a car in Walworth County, Wisc. in May 2017. They were set on driving at rapid speeds down a long, cornfield-lined road — and sharing their escapade on social media.

As the 17-year-old behind the wheel accelerated to 123 miles per hour, one of the passengers opened Snapchat.

His parents say their son wanted to capture the experience using one of the app's filters that documents real-life speed, hoping for engagement and attention from followers on the messaging app.

It was one of the last things the trio did before the vehicle ran off the road and crashed into a tree, killing all of them.

Was Snapchat partially to blame? The boys' parents think so. And, in a surprise decision on Tuesday, a federal appeals court agreed.

The ruling, from a three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, has set off intense debate among legal watchers about the future of a decades-old law that has shielded tech companies from civil lawsuits.

Personal injury lawyer: 'It's a triumphant day'

The boys' parents sued Snap, Inc., the maker of Snapchat, after the tragedy. They allege that the company bore some responsibility. The district court responded how courts usually do when a tech platform is sued in a civil lawsuit: by dismissing the case. The judge cited the sweeping immunity social media companies enjoy under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act.

The law provides legal immunity to tech companies from libel and other civil suits for what people post on sites, regardless of how harmful it may be.

But the appeals court's reversal paves a way around the all-powerful law, saying it doesn't apply because this case is not about what someone posted to Snapchat, but rather the design of the app itself.

The parents allege that Snapchat's speed filter entices young people to drive at astounding speeds. And the federal appears court said Snap should be treated like any other company that makes a product that can lead to injury or harm to consumers.

"Snap indisputably designed Snapchat's reward system and Speed Filter and made those aspects of Snapchat available to users through the Internet," Judge Kim McLane Wardlaw wrote for the court. "This type of claim rests on the premise that manufacturers have a 'duty to exercise due care in supplying products that do not present unreasonable risk of injury or harm to the public.'"

Wardlaw went on to write that "CDA immunity," referring to Section 230, is "unavailable in this case."

Carrie Goldberg, a victims' rights lawyer who specializes in online abuse, brought a similar product liability case against the dating app Grindr but a federal appeals, the 2nd U.S. Circuit of Appeals, rejected it on Section 230 grounds.

To see a different federal appeals court go the opposite way could create an opening for more cases to challenge tech companies over flawed platform design leading to foreseeable harms, she said.

"It's a triumphant day to see that an Internet company can be held responsible for products that are defectively designed," Goldberg said in an interview. "The biggest hurdle in personal injury law is getting in front of a jury, and this could lead to that situation for multi-billion-dollar technology companies."

But legal experts who study online speech were more skeptical, saying it may trigger more lawsuits that try to weaken Section 230, but the chance of succeeding are still slim.

"It invites more attempts to test how narrow the Ninth Circuit thinks Section 230 is, but that might be it," said Jeff Kosseff, a law professor at the U.S. Naval Academy and the author of a book on Section 230. "We know in this case the court has determined that 230 does not apply. I'm sure there are plaintiffs' lawyers out there thinking, 'Well, how about this other type of product flaw?'"

Eric Goldman, a Santa Clara University law professor who also studies technology law, pointed to a similar case against Snap that played out in state courts in Georgia.

In that case, an appeals court found that Snap could be sued for harm caused from the Speed Filter.

But when a trial court re-examined the case, it found that Snap cannot be held liable for someone misusing a product. (The messaging app does apply a "DON'T SNAP AND DRIVE" warning to the filter.)

A spokeswoman for Snap declined to comment.

Increasing the odds of a Supreme Court ruling

The parents' lawsuit now returns to the lower court. If it goes the same way as the Georgia case, Snapchat will dodge any legal responsibility. But if the trial court agrees to hold Snap accountable, that could be significant, Goldman said.

"So we're right now unclear on the impact of this opinion," he said.

The Ninth Circuit has issued many opinions that strongly support technology companies' keeping sweeping legal immunity, he noted, saying now that there is a back-and-forth on Section 230, the legal landscape is complicated.

"They just don't agree with themselves," he said. As a result, there's a lot of whiplash in Ninth Circuit jurisprudence."

And he said in the handful of cases where Section 230 was found not to be a legal shield from a civil lawsuit, lower courts have ultimately sided with the tech companies.

"I don't think that this opinion actually will open up the Pandora's Box of saying, 'You can sue a website for how it's designed under all circumstances,'" Goldman said.

The reason, Goldman says, is because the Ninth Circuit essentially ruled that Snap's being a publisher was not as relevant as the allegation that the messaging app motivated harmful activity.

Yet someone most likely would use Snapchat's speed filter only if they meant to publish their post.

This is important because under Section 230, Snapchat cannot be held liable (or treated as a "publisher or speaker") for what any users post to platforms.

"The Ninth Circuit is walking a really fine line about the distinction between things that people do to generate content and the fact that the content only really matters because it's going to be published," Goldman said.

To Kosseff, the Ninth Circuit's now being split with the Second Circuit on a possible workaround for holding tech companies responsible could make it more likely that the U.S. Supreme Court will weigh in, something at least one justice on the court, Clarence Thomas, has shown an eagerness to do.

"This increases the chances of the Supreme Court hearing a Section 230 case," Kosseff said. "We have a growing divergence in how courts treat these kind of challenges."

Pin it

NorCal News

  • IMG 8194
    May 07, 2021

    Santa Rosa residents call for more police accountability

    During this week’s special Santa Rosa city council meeting, spanning almost two full days, the public heard three reports interrogating Santa Rosa officers’ responses to the 2020 protests. They say Santa Rosa police used an unparalleled amount of tear gas and four unauthorized barricade rounds…
  • syringe 3902915 640
    April 30, 2021

    Context is important when choosing J&J vaccine

    Before the Johnson and Johnson vaccine was paused, Dr. Brian Prystowsky, a pediatrician and vaccine expert at Sutter Health in Santa Rosa, was excited about the one-dose shot. "I think that two weeks ago, I was primarily recommending Johnson and Johnson vaccine to everybody, literally before this…
  • nurse 4967171 640
    April 27, 2021

    Sonoma County resumes use of J&J vaccine

    In accordance with recommendations by federal and state health officials, Sonoma County is once again distributing the one-dose Johnson and Johnson vaccine after a two week pause. In a statement Health Officer Dr. Sundari Mase said the vaccine is safe and the risk of developing blood clots is…
    April 22, 2021

    County holds its first COVID-19 briefing in Spanish

    Instead of offering Spanish translations online during the meeting, like they’ve been doing for the past year, officials switched to Spanish as the primary language this week, with English translations available on Youtube. The change is an effort to reach the county’s Latinx communities, who have…
  • Screen Shot 2021 04 22 at 1.45.10 PM
    April 22, 2021

    Residents react to the Chauvin verdict

    Photo of a Black Lives Matter Protest in 2020. (Photo by Adia White)Santa Rosa Jr. College student and activist Caitie Ferro cried when she first heard the news that Derek Chauvin was guilty of murder, and thought the dozens of marches she went to over the past year might have led to change. "All…
  • i am a student 1412778 640
    April 16, 2021

    Santa Rosa parents ask district to fully reopen

    At least 250 parents in Santa Rosa city schools this week signed a letter asking the district to open full time, in accordance with the state’s updated reopening plan. On April 1st, the district began in-person instruction two shortened days a week for elementary aged children. Next will be…
  • Screen Shot 2021 04 14 at 5.52.45 PM
    Apr 15, 2021

    As vaccine eligibility opens, hesitation is the next hurdle

    As of today, all adults in Sonoma County are eligible to sign up for the COVID-19 vaccine, but there’s still a lot of hesitancy about whether to get…
  • injection 5722329 640
    Apr 14, 2021

    J&J pause slows down vaccinations of vulnerable residents

    Because the new J&J vaccine didn’t arrive in the county until March, so far it only makes up about three percent of those administered. But the…
  • Default Image
    Apr 13, 2021

    Businesses have more options in orange tier

    After spending six months stuck in the state's most restrictive purple tier, Sonoma joined the majority of the Bay Area in the second least…
  • Apr 12, 2021

    Windsor mayor under sex-crimes cloud

    Windsor Mayor Dominic Foppoli is refusing to step down despite sex-crime allegations from half a dozen women, including a fellow city council member.…
    Apr 07, 2021

    Sonoma County enters orange tier

    Sonoma County's virtual community COVID-19 briefing.Less than a month after moving out of the state’s most restrictive purple tier, the County made…
  • IMG 7932 3
    Apr 06, 2021

    Health Fair vaccinates hundreds of residents

    Art about the COVID-19 vaccine by Santa Rosa art nonprofit Raizes Collective at the Cesar Chavez Health Fair. People waited in line starting at 9…
  • Document
    Apr 01, 2021

    Santa Rosa hands out weather radios to boost alert system

    A NOAA Weather Radio. (photo courtesy of the City of Santa Rosa's website)Santa Rosa is boosting its ability to notify residents when a fire breaks…
  • Screen Shot 2021 03 31 at 10.19.40 AM
    Mar 31, 2021

    Sonoma County teens design quarantine mural

    Santa Rosa-based art organization Artstart's Shelter in Place Mural. (photo courtesy of Jennifer Tatum). COVID has affected everyone, old and young.…
  • covid 19 4987797 1280
    Mar 29, 2021

    COVID-19 easing, while vaccine distribution hits bottleneck

    By Marc Albert Improving data suggests vaccines are gaining the upper hand and COVID-19 related restrictions across Sonoma County may be eased as…
  • Screen Shot 2021 03 24 at 5.08.32 PM
    Mar 24, 2021

    New Data Shows an Uptick in Fatal Drug Overdoses

    COVID-19 numbers are on the decline after Sonoma County moved into the state’s red tier a week and a half ago, but communities are facing other types…

National News

Northern California
Public Media Newsletter

Get the latest updates on programs and events.